How do I convert this in a LINQ for NHibernate statement or queryover?
Is it possible at all? Seems like a standard thing (latest related object must meet some criteria).
select item, tag
from MyItem item
join item.Tags tag
where tag.Id = (
select max(tag2.Id)
from MyItem item2
join item2.Tags tag2
where item2.Id = item.Id
group by item2.Id
)
Best regards,
Ok, answering my own question again. It is that simple with LINQ.
var resi = from x in session.Query<MyItem>()
let maxTagId = x.Tags.Max(tag => tag.Id)
select new { Item = x, Tag = x.Tags.Single(tag => tag.Id == maxTagId)};
The generated sql looks like
SELECT myitem0_.id AS
col_0_0_,
(SELECT mytag2_.id
FROM myitem_mytag tags1_,
[mytag] mytag2_
WHERE myitem0_.id = tags1_.myitemid
AND tags1_.mytagid = mytag2_.id
AND mytag2_.id = (SELECT Cast(Max(mytag4_.id) AS INT)
FROM myitem_mytag tags3_,
[mytag] mytag4_
WHERE myitem0_.id = tags3_.myitemid
AND tags3_.mytagid = mytag4_.id)) AS
col_1_0_,
myitem0_.id AS
Id0_,
myitem0_.name AS
Name0_
FROM [myitem] myitem0_
and seems semantically correct.
Related
So I have the following Linq query:
var member = (from mem in
context.Members.Include(m =>
m.MemberProjects.Select(mp => mp.Project))
where mem.MemberId == memberId
select mem).FirstOrDefault();
This returns a Member entity, with a set of MemberProjects that have a Project child. I would like to limit the MemberProjects to only those for which the Project child has a property
ProjectIdParent == null.
One of my failed attempts might make the intent clearer:
var member = (from mem in context.Members
.Include(m => m.MemberProjects
.Where(mp =>
mp.Project.ProjectIdParent == null)
.Select(proj => proj.Project))
where mem.MemberId == memberId
select mem).FirstOrDefault();
This of course complains of an invalid Include expression because of the Where clause.
Any thoughts on how to do this would be great :)
DISCLAIMER: I havent tested this. This is just an idea. If you let me know the results, I will update this accordingly. (Skip to the update part for the tested solutions)
var member = (from mps in context.MemberProjects
.Include(m => m.Members)
.Include(m => m.Projects)
where mps.Project.ProjectIdParent == null
select mps)
.FirstOrDefault(mprojs => mprojs.Member.MemberId == memberId);
I'd also analyze the queries using something like EFProfiler to make sure the generated queries dont leave the realm of sanity.
You can also take a look at this post by Jimmy Bogard on Many to Many relationships with ORMs.
Update
I came up with multiple tested solutions for this with EF 6.1.3. My Edmx looked like below:
The setup data is like below:
I was able to run code below to get the MemberFive correctly
var member = context.Members.FirstOrDefault
(m => m.MemberId == memberId
&& m.Projects.Any(p => p.ProjectParentId == null));
The generated SQL looked like this:
SELECT TOP (1) [Extent1].[MemberId] AS [MemberId],
[Extent1].[MemberName] AS [MemberName]
FROM [dbo].[Members] AS [Extent1]
WHERE ([Extent1].[MemberId] = 1)
AND (EXISTS (SELECT 1 AS [C1]
FROM (SELECT [MemberProjects].[MemberId] AS [MemberId],
[MemberProjects].[ProjectId] AS [ProjectId]
FROM [dbo].[MemberProjects] AS [MemberProjects])
AS [Extent2]
INNER JOIN [dbo].[Projects] AS [Extent3]
ON [Extent3].[ProjectId] = [Extent2].[ProjectId]
WHERE ([Extent1].[MemberId] = [Extent2].[MemberId])
AND ([Extent3].[ProjectParentId] IS NULL)))
If you dont like the generated query you can use this:
var memberQuery = #"Select M.* from Members M
inner join MemberProjects MP on M.MemberId = Mp.ProjectId
inner join Projects P on MP.ProjectId = P.ProjectId
where M.MemberId = #MemberId and P.ProjectParentId is NULL";
var memberParams = new[]
{
new SqlParameter("#MemberId", 1)
};
var member3 = context.Members.SqlQuery(memberQuery, memberParams)
.FirstOrDefault();
The later consistently returned under 20ms vs the other one hovered around 60ms (if that matters to you).
I hope this helps.
I see Dynamic linq in below link:
ScottGu
I want to use this method to select a dynamic query like this:
I have a complex select and this way not solve my problem,
this is my select:
Select sUserName,sname, sFamily,sMobail,sid,sNumberSt,sActive,sPic,sDate from Student where {0} order by sid desc";
which {0} is a complex Condition:
sname like %somthing% and susername=N'something' and sid in (select sidfk from tablex where userteacher=N'name1')
and this condition is passed to method.
I must say that:
I don's know my condition,my condition specified with user search params.this condition that I say,Is only one example of what I want to do.
How can I do this?
Only way that solve my problem:
I send tow parameters instead of one,one for student and one for tablex:
var az = db.tablex.Where(p => p.userteacher== name1)
.Select(p => p.sidfk).ToList();
var query = db.Students.Where(textSearch).Where(s=>az.Contains(s.sid)).OrderByDescending(s => s.sid)
.Select(s => new
{
s.sUserName,
s.sname,
s.sFamily,
s.sMobail,
s.sid,
s.sNumberSt,
s.sActive,
s.sPic,
s.sDate,
});
wiche textSearch is :
sname like %somthing% and susername=N'something'
with dynamic linq
any better way is exist?
You don't need to use dynamic linq for this situation.
string paramA = "", paramB = "";
var query = from x in context.table1
where x.name == paramA
where context.table2.Where(y => y.field1 == paramB).Any(y => y.id == x.id)
select x;
Dynamic Linq usually use if in query you don't know what field will be use, so in your sample you use only params for conditions with field, so you don't ned dynamic linq
you can little optimize you query like this
var query = from student in db.Students
join teacher in db.tablex on student.sid equals teacher.sidfk
where student.sname.Contains('somthing') &&
susername=='something' &&
teacher.userteacher=='name1'
orderby s.sid descending
select new
{
s.sUserName,
s.sname,
s.sFamily,
s.sMobail,
s.sid,
s.sNumberSt,
s.sActive,
s.sPic,
s.sDate,
};
I want to do a LINQ NOT EXISTS on query MULTIPLE TABLES.
All examples on Google or SO are handling two tables I'm working with three so I'm struggling as a newbie on LINQ on how to reference them correctly.
First I tried this LINQ query
var nocertificates = (
from x in rmdb.t_certificates
from ce in rmdb.t_user_certificates
from u in rmdb.t_users
where u.id == ce.uid && ce.value != x.id
select x).AsEnumerable().Select(x => new ViewModelCheckBox()
{
Value = x.id.ToString(),
Name = x.name,
Checked = false
});
I used the ugly three times from as I'm not that good with creating types for joining.
But that gave wrong result and I realized I had to go for a NOT EXISTS
So I built a new query in T-SQL
This is the SQL query it works!
select distinct * from t_certificates tc
where NOT EXISTS
(
select distinct * from t_users tu, t_user_certificates tuc
WHERE tu.email = 'user#email.com'
and tu.id = tuc.[uid]
and tuc.value = tc.id
)
How would I do that in LINQ?
This is the question, I will award my answer for that!
BUT!
When we are at it... I'm really curious on the answer.. Is it possible to do one LINQ query that return an Ienumerable with both those that EXISTS and NOT EXISTS resulting in an object which will hold DIFFERENT VALUES on the checked property EXISTS -> CHECKED = true NOT EXISTS -> CHECKED = false
This is how I create my object.
.Select(x => new ViewModelCheckBox()
{
Value = x.id.ToString(),
Name = x.name,
Checked = this should be different based on exists or not
});
The LINQ answer should look something like this (untested):
var nocertificates =
from x in rmdb.t_certificates
join tuc in (
from u in rmdb.t_users
join ce in rmdb.t_user_certificates on u.id == ce.uid
select ce.value
) on tuc.value = tc.id into tuc
from y in tuc.DefaultIfEmpty()
where y == null
select x;
This is what I ended up using!
var query = (from tc in rmdb.t_certificates
where !(
from tu in rmdb.t_users
from tuc in rmdb.t_user_certificates
where tu.email == username
&& tu.id == tuc.uid
&& tuc.value == tc.id select tc).AsEnumerable().Any()
select new ViewModelCheckBox()
{ Checked = false,
intconverter = tc.id,
Name = tc.name
});
Can anyone help?
I have 1 class, basically it holds Members and within that class is a List.
The members i have in a List also... So basically it goes like this,
I have 2 members and each member has a number of sessions.
I wish to only return each member with 1 Session.
I have done a LINQ query, but of course it doesn't work...
I think i need to do a self join, any ideas?
Basically my error is m doesn't exist in my subquery self join.
var sessions =
from m in this.members
join s in
(
from se in m.Sessions
group se by se.Name into g
select new {Name = g.Key, SessioEndTime = g.Max(a=>a.SessioEndTime)}
)
on m.Name equals s.Name
select new { MemberName = m.Name, SessionTime = s.SessioEndTime}
I would appreciate any feedback anyone has.
Thanks in advance.
EDIT
Ok i managed to do it like the following, but is this the best way?
var sessions =
from m in this.members
let sn = m.Sessions.OrderByDescending(a => a.SessionEndTime).FirstOrDefault()
select new { MemberName = m.Name, SessionTime = sn.SessioEndTime}
This way sn contains 1 record, but i have access to all the properties...
But is this the best way to do using a LET?
Thanks.
Unless I am missing something you need this, no?
var sessions =
from m in members
select new {
MemberName = m.Name,
SessionTime = m.Sessions.Max(s => s.SessioEndTime)
};
You have to change the way you think about LINQ queries, think more from object point rather than from SQL implementation point. What is it that I need? I need all members, each with its latest session end time, then act on that.
EDIT:
The let option you used is ok, just keep something in mind FirstOrDefault will return null if member has an empty list of Sessions, and then sn.SessionEndTime hits null reference. If on the other hand you are certain that every member has at least one session use First instead or aggregate.
Also don't use FirstOrDefault() in the let, it kind of messes up the LINQ and prevents it from tying it to the master (causing a separate SQL query for each master to detect missing subsets), so usable queries with let are:
from m in Members
let sn = m.Sessions.Max(s => s.SessioEndTime)
select new { MemberName = m.Name, SessionTime = sn};
from m in Members
let sn = m.Sessions.OrderByDescending(a => a.SessioEndTime).First()
select new { MemberName = m.Name, SessionTime = sn.SessioEndTime};
As for ordering vs Max aggregation, both queries will generate a subquery:
-- MAX
SELECT [t0].[Name] AS [MemberName], (
SELECT MAX([t1].[SessioEndTime])
FROM [Session] AS [t1]
WHERE [t1].[memberId] = [t0].[id]
) AS [SessionTime]
FROM [Member] AS [t0]
GO
-- ordering
SELECT [t0].[Name] AS [MemberName], (
SELECT [t2].[SessioEndTime]
FROM (
SELECT TOP (1) [t1].[SessioEndTime]
FROM [Session] AS [t1]
WHERE [t1].[memberId] = [t0].[id]
ORDER BY [t1].[SessioEndTime] DESC
) AS [t2]
) AS [SessionTime]
FROM [Member] AS [t0]
With a descending index on SessioEndTime the ordering script is about twice slower (you can get execution plans for these to check for yourself), without the index its about 5times slower.
I have a need to create a LINQ query that returns results based on a subquery. Not quite sure I'm wording that properly but the best way I know to ask is to show an example. How can I turn the following TSQL query into a LINQ query (tables are same name as objects):
SELECT CuisineId, Name
FROM Cuisine
WHERE CuisineId NOT IN (SELECT CuisineId
FROM RestaurantCuisine
WHERE RestaurantId = #id)
As you can guess, I'm trying to get a list of "available" cuisines to be listed for a user to add to a list of cuisines that a restaurant offers. The LINQ I have thus far returns ALL cuisines and doesn't take in account of the existing CuisineId's that have already been added to the other table:
I've looked all over for an example but not quite sure how to describe exactly what I need. I looked at the MSDN reference for LINQ queries but couldn't find anything like what I need:
MSDN LINQ Sample Queries
Anyone able to give me an example?
In C#:
var query =
from c in db.Cuisine
where !(from rc in db.RestaurantCuisine
where rc.RestaurantId == id
select rc.CuisineId)
.Contains(c.CuisineId)
select new {
c.CuisineId,
c.Name
};
In VB.NET:
Dim availableCuisines = _
From c In db.Cuisines _
Where Not (From rc In db.RestaurantCuisines _
Where rc.RestaurantId = id _
Select rc.CuisineId) _
.Contains(c.CuisineId) _
Select c
var cuisines = db.Cuisine.Where(c => !RestaurantCuisine.Any(
rc => rc.RestaurantId == c.Id && rc.CuisineId == c.CuisineId);
Try:
Cuisine.Where(c => !RestaurantCuisine.Select(rc => rc.CuisineID).Contains(c.CuisineID)).Select(c => c);
var query = (from c in Cuisine
where !(from rest in RestaurantCuisine
where (rest.RestaurantID == id)).Contains(c.CuisineId)
select new
{
CuisineID = c.CuisineID,
Name = c.Name
});