Basically I am listing all servers named 'ServerName' in DESC created order. If for instance I have 50 of them, I need to obtain a list of the 40 serverIds so that they can be deleted; that way I only keep the latest 10 records (Servers) created. Here is the simple SQL code:
Delete ContosoServers Where serverId In
(
Select
serverId
From
(
Select
serverId
,row_number() Over(Order By created desc) as recordNumber
From
UDS.ContosoServers
Where
name = 'ServerName'
) ServerRecords
Where recordNumber > 10
)
I think I would need to create a List of some anonymous type (serverId, recordNumber). Once I obtain that I could just loop through the list from 11 to 50 and delete all servers records, keep 1 to 10 which are the latest.
I came up with this solution but I think is way too much code. In SQL is very simple but in LINQ it looks like it requires more work. I am just trying to avoid all these loops, here it is:
private static void DeleteOldRecords(string serverName)
{
const int numberOfRecordsToKeep = 10;
using (var context = new MyContext())
{
var servers = context.ContosoServers
.Where(n => n.name == serverName)
.OrderByDescending(o => o.created)
.Select(s => new { s.serverId }).ToList();
//skip the first 10 rows and delete the rest 11,20...
int i = 0;
foreach (var s in servers)
{
if (i > numberOfRecordsToKeep - 1)
{
//delete row
var entityToDelete = context.ContosoServers.Find(s.serverId);
if (context.Entry(entityToDelete).State == EntityState.Detached)
{
context.ContosoServers.Attach(entityToDelete);
}
context.ContosoServers.Remove(entityToDelete);
}
i++;
}
context.SaveChanges();
}
Any ideas of how to improve this? this does not seem "elegant" :-)
Thank you
Assuming that you are using LINQ to SQ, try the code below
DataClasses1DataContext context = new DataClasses1DataContext();
var d = (from s in context.ContosoServers
orderby s.created descending
select s).Take(10);
context.samples.DeleteAllOnSubmit(d);
context.SubmitChanges();
Related
I'm trying to display cities names where a count is greater than 1. I can do it easy in SQL and am close in LINQ but can't figure out how to use group and also get a count and display a name
var query = (from c in Consumer
group c
by new { c.City, size = c.City.Count() }
into results
select new { Name = results.Key.City })
.Where(a => size > 0);
The size part doesn't work
try this query:
var list= Consumer.GroupBy(s=>s.City)
.Select(s=>new {
City = s.Key,
size = s.Count(),
})
.Where(s=>s.size>0).ToList();
I am using BLToolKit in a project of mine and I was trying to get this to work. What I don't like is that I am trying to average a bunch of temps down to the minute, but the select statement that is being generated groups by the minute but then selects the original time. I think I am doing the linq expression correctly (but then again, i am not getting the results i expect). (this is C#, if you care) Anyone know what is going wrong?
var test = (from r in db.SensorReadingRaws
where r.TimeLogged < DateTime.Now.AddMinutes(-2)
group r by new
{
Sensor = r.SensorNumber,
//group time down to the minute
Time = r.TimeLogged.AddSeconds(-1 * r.TimeLogged.Second).AddMilliseconds(-1 * r.TimeLogged.Millisecond)
} into grouped
select new SensorReading
{
SensorNumber = grouped.Key.Sensor,
TimeLogged = grouped.Key.Time,
Reading = (int)grouped.Average(x => x.Reading)
}).ToList();
textBox1.Text = db.LastQuery;
and the resulting query is this
SELECT
[r].[SensorNumber],
[r].[TimeLogged],
Avg([r].[Reading]) as [c1]
FROM
[SensorReadingRaw] [r]
WHERE
[r].[TimeLogged] < #p1
GROUP BY
[r].[SensorNumber],
DateAdd(Millisecond, Convert(Float, -DatePart(Millisecond, [r].[TimeLogged])), DateAdd(Second, Convert(Float, -DatePart(Second, [r].[TimeLogged])), [r].[TimeLogged])),
[r].[TimeLogged]
I discovered that
BLToolkit.Data.Linq.Sql.AsSql<T>(T obj)
can be used as a workaround for this case.
When applying this function to the required grouped key properties in select statement you get rid of grouping/selecting an original field.
It may look something like:
_queryStore.Leads().
GroupBy(x => new {
x.LeadDate.Hour,
x.LeadDate.Minute
}).
Select(x => new {
Hour = Sql.AsSql(x.Key.Hour),
Minute = Sql.AsSql(x.Key.Minute),
Count = x.Count()
});
and in your particular case:
var test = (from r in db.SensorReadingRaws
where r.TimeLogged < DateTime.Now.AddMinutes(-2)
group r by new
{
Sensor = r.SensorNumber,
//group time down to the minute
Time = r.TimeLogged.AddSeconds(-1 * r.TimeLogged.Second).AddMilliseconds(-1 * r.TimeLogged.Millisecond)
} into grouped
select new SensorReading
{
SensorNumber = grouped.Key.Sensor,
TimeLogged = Sql.AsSql(grouped.Key.Time),
Reading = (int)grouped.Average(x => x.Reading)
}).ToList();
I got same issue yesterday.
Today I found a workaround. The idea is to write 2 linq queries. First transforming the data and the second grouping the result:
var bandAndDate =
(from r in repo.Entities
select new {Band = r.Score / 33, r.StartTime.Date});
var examsByBandAndDay =
(from r in bandAndDate
group r by new {r.Band, r.Date } into g
select new { g.Key.Date, g.Key.Band, Count = g.Count() }).ToList();
Both this queries run one SQL that do the job:
SELECT
[t1].[c1] as [c11],
[t1].[c2] as [c21],
Count(*) as [c3]
FROM
(
SELECT
[r].[Score] / 33 as [c2],
Cast(Floor(Cast([r].[StartTime] as Float)) as DateTime) as [c1]
FROM
[Results] [r]
) [t1]
GROUP BY
[t1].[c2],
[t1].[c1]
The following code works, but it's not a nice code. (low performance)
I have a dictionary with value and key.
First i go trough every webcodes who exist. Then i load all participants in a list (where webcode equals the actual webcode in the foreach). After that i add the data (parameter of the webcode and a count of participants to the dictionary).
Guid compID = Guid.Parse(wID);
ChartModel webcodes = new ChartModel();
webcodes.Title = "Webcodes Statistics";
webcodes.Data = new Dictionary<string, int>();
var webcodesData = db.t_Webcode;
foreach (var w in webcodesData)
{
var wData = db.t_Participant.Where(t => t.FK_Competition == compID && t.Webcode == w.Webcode);
if (wData.Count() != 0)
webcodes.Data.Add(w.Parameter, wData.Count());
}
ViewBag.Webcodes = webcodes;
TIA
You need something along these lines:
webcodes.Data = (from w in db.t_Webcode
join p in db.t_Participant on w.Webcode equals p.Webcode
where p.FK_Competition == compID
group w by w.Parameter into g
select new { g.Key, Count = g.Count() }).ToDictionary();
I can't test it but that is the type of query you need.
This will assume that you have relationships defined in your database and that your LINQ to SQL datacontext are aware of them. If not, you will need to join manually on t_Participants from tWebcode.
This should execute in 1 single SQL query, instead of 1 query per row in tWebcode.
var webcodesAndNoOfParticipants =
from webcode in db.tWebcode
// Define number of participants for this webcode
let numberOfParticipants = webcode.t_Participants.Count(participant => participant.FK_Competition == compID)
where numberOfParticipants > 0
select new {
WebcodeParameter = webcode.Parameter,
NoOfParticipants = numberOfParticipants
};
webcodes.Data = webcodesAndNoOfParticipants.ToDictionary(x => x.WebcodeParameter, x => x.NoOfParticipants);
I have a linq query like this:
var accounts =
from account in context.Accounts
from guranteer in account.Gurantors
where guranteer.GuarantorRegistryId == guranteerRegistryId
select new AccountsReport
{
recordIndex = ?
CreditRegistryId = account.CreditRegistryId,
AccountNumber = account.AccountNo,
}
I want to populate recordIndex with the value of current row number in collection returned by the LINQ. How can I get row number ?
Row number is not supported in linq-to-entities. You must first retrieve records from database without row number and then add row number by linq-to-objects. Something like:
var accounts =
(from account in context.Accounts
from guranteer in account.Gurantors
where guranteer.GuarantorRegistryId == guranteerRegistryId
select new
{
CreditRegistryId = account.CreditRegistryId,
AccountNumber = account.AccountNo,
})
.AsEnumerable() // Moving to linq-to-objects
.Select((r, i) => new AccountReport
{
RecordIndex = i,
CreditRegistryId = r.CreditRegistryId,
AccountNumber = r.AccountNo,
});
LINQ to objects has this builtin for any enumerator:
http://weblogs.asp.net/fmarguerie/archive/2008/11/10/using-the-select-linq-query-operator-with-indexes.aspx
Edit: Although IQueryable supports it too (here and here) it has been mentioned that this does unfortunately not work for LINQ to SQL/Entities.
new []{"aap", "noot", "mies"}
.Select( (element, index) => new { element, index });
Will result in:
{ { element = aap, index = 0 },
{ element = noot, index = 1 },
{ element = mies, index = 2 } }
There are other LINQ Extension methods (like .Where) with the extra index parameter overload
Try using let like this:
int[] ints = new[] { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 };
int counter = 0;
var result = from i in ints
where i % 2 == 0
let number = ++counter
select new { I = i, Number = number };
foreach (var r in result)
{
Console.WriteLine(r.Number + ": " + r.I);
}
I cannot test it with actual LINQ to SQL or Entity Framework right now. Note that the above code will retain the value of the counter between multiple executions of the query.
If this is not supported with your specific provider you can always foreach (thus forcing the execution of the query) and assign the number manually in code.
Because the query inside the question filters by a single id, I think the answers given wont help out. Ofcourse you can do it all in memory client side, but depending how large the dataset is, and whether network is involved, this could be an issue.
If you need a SQL ROW_NUMBER [..] OVER [..] equivalent, the only way I know is to create a view in your SQL server and query against that.
This Tested and Works:
Amend your code as follows:
int counter = 0;
var accounts =
from account in context.Accounts
from guranteer in account.Gurantors
where guranteer.GuarantorRegistryId == guranteerRegistryId
select new AccountsReport
{
recordIndex = counter++
CreditRegistryId = account.CreditRegistryId,
AccountNumber = account.AccountNo,
}
Hope this helps.. Though its late:)
I have this fragment of code:
SmsDataClassesDataContext dc = new SmsDataClassesDataContext();
// Get the customer
Customer currentCustomer = dc.Customers.Single( c => c.Hash1 == forThisHash );
// Get from Name (LINQ to XML)
var q = from c in thisSmsPack.Descendants("from")
select c;
string from = q.First().Value;
foreach ( XElement element in thisSmsPack.Descendants("to") )
{
// Create the queue
SmsQueue sq = new SmsQueue();
sq.CustomerId = currentCustomer.CustomerId;
sq.MsgFrom = from;
sq.MsgTo = element.Attribute("name").Value;
sq.MsgPhone = element.Attribute("phone").Value;
sq.MsgBody = element.Attribute("msg").Value;
sq.Priority = currentCustomer.SendsSmsAtPriority;
sq.DontSendUntil = GetNextSendDate();
// sq.TimeCreated = System.DateTime.Now;
currentCustomer.SmsQueues.Add(sq);
}
dc.SubmitChanges();
I am creating new instances of "SmsQueues", populating the values and when the foreach loop is finished I submit the changes. Given the new lambda/linq/anonymous types that .NET 3.5 has, is there a more "modern" way to accomplish the above?
As a side question, maybe related, can I return an existing type composed of different columns in the select part of the linq expression?
Suppose you have three tables:
T1 == T1.Id, T1.Name
T2 == T2.Id, T2.Phone
T3 == T3.Name, T3.Phone, T3.SomethingElse
Can I perform a LINQ query that returns:
T1.Name, T2.Phone, SomethingElseNew
And let .NET know that that is of Type T3 (and it's a new instance of it)?
That way when I SubmitChanges, new T3 instances are inserted in the DB?
I don't know if I make myself clear :S
I don't have a system available to test this, but I think this (or something very close) should work.
CustomerId = currentCustomer.CustomerId;
var sqrange = from element in thisSmsPack.Descendants("to") )
select new SmsQueue
{
// Create the queue
MsgFrom = from,
MsgTo = element.Attribute("name").Value,
MsgPhone = element.Attribute("phone").Value,
MsgBody = element.Attribute("msg").Value,
Priority = currentCustomer.SendsSmsAtPriority,
DontSendUntil = GetNextSendDate()
// TimeCreated = System.DateTime.Now
};
currentCustomer.SmsQueues.AddRange(sqrange);
EDIT: Fixed the numerous syntax errors (as delineated in the comments)
You could do something like this (syntax may be off slightly, no intellisense here):
var q = T1.Join(T2, t => t.Id, t2 => t2.Id)
select new T3{Name=t.Name,Phone=t2.Phone,SomethingElseNew="Chickens"};