So I wrote this code:
def translate_word word
vowel = ["a", "e", "i", "o", "u"]
if vowel.include? word[0]
word = word + "ay"
elsif vowel.include? word[1]
word = word[1..-1] + word[0] + "ay"
else
word = word[2..-1] + word[0..1] + "ay"
end
end
Translates a word into pig latin. For my purposes, works great. But what if we want to translate more than one word?
def translate string
vowel = ["a", "e", "i", "o", "u"]
words = string.split(" ")
words.each do |word|
if vowel.include? word[0]
word = word + "ay"
elsif vowel.include? word[1]
word = word[1..-1] + word[0] + "ay"
else
word = word[2..-1] + word[0..1] + "ay"
end
end
words.join(" ")
end
Except, if we try to do this with one word, it'll notice there aren't any spaces, say screw that, and return a string. Won't even throw me an error when I try to .each it, but the .each won't do any thing.
puts "apple".split
#=>apple
puts translate "apple"
#=>apple
This isn't an insurmountable problem. I could just run string.includes? " " and then run the two slightly different programs depending on if it was there or not. But this seems very ineloquent. What would be a better or more idiomatic way to deal with the string and the loop?
Assigning another value to the block argument doesn't change the array element:
words.each do |word|
word = word + "ay" # <- this doesn't work as expected
end
To change the element, you have to call a method that changes the receiver, e.g.:
words.each do |word|
word << "ay"
end
However, instead of repeating the algorithm, you could just call translate_word for each word:
def translate(string)
string.split.map { |word| translate_word(word) }.join(" ")
end
translate("apple orange")
#=> "appleay orangeay"
I've used split and join here, but you could also use gsub:
def translate(string)
string.gsub(/\w+/) { |word| translate_word(word) }
end
As far as I can see you're not manipulating your original array words.
You would need something like this:
def translate string
vowel = ["a", "e", "i", "o", "u"]
words = string.split(" ")
words.each_with_index do |word, index|
if vowel.include? word[0]
word = word + "ay"
elsif vowel.include? word[1]
word = word[1..-1] + word[0] + "ay"
else
word = word[2..-1] + word[0..1] + "ay"
end
words[index] = word
end
words.join(" ")
end
Related
I'm having trouble with a Ruby pig latin translator translating 2 or more words. I've successfully figured out how to translate words beginning with a vowel, consonant, or two consonants with my function translate, and I'm wanting to create a second function, translate_words, that uses .map with the first function.
When the string, "eat pie", gets submitted, the output is "eat pieay". It only changes the second word and also does it incorrectly (should be "eatay iepay"). I've looked at multiple other solutions on SO without luck. I'm still very new with regex so those solutions were a little over my head.
This project works with RSpec and I've added the test code below mine.
Here's my code:
def translate(input)
pig_string = ''
if input[0] =~ /[aeiou]/
return input + 'ay'
elsif input[0] =~ /[^aeiou]/ && input[1] =~ /[aeiou]/
return input[1..-1] + input[0] + 'ay'
elsif input[0..1] =~ /[^aeiou]/
return input[2..-1] + input[0..1] + 'ay'
else
return input[0] + input + 'ay'
end
end
def translate_words(multi_words)
word_count = multi_words.split.size
if word_count > 1
multi_words.map! do |word|
translate(word)
end
end
end
RSpec:
it "translates two words" do
s = translate("eat pie")
expect(s).to eq("eatay iepay")
end
As per comments above by bitsapien and Sergio Tulentsev :
def translate_words(multi_words)
multi_words.split.map do |word|
translate(word)
end.join(' ')
end
map will suffice instead of map!.
translate_words('eat plie') #=> "eatay ieplay"
This question already has answers here:
Why word 'translate' is messing irb?
(2 answers)
Closed 6 years ago.
The issue is with the following code:
#write your code here
def translate phrase
phrase = phrase.downcase.split(/ /)
phrase.collect! do |word|
word = word.split(//)
switched = false
while switched == false
word.each_index do |letter|
if word[letter] == ("a" || "e" || "i" || "o" || "u")
switched = true
word = (word[letter..-1] + word[0..(letter-1)]).join + "ay"
end
end
end
end
return phrase.join(" ")
end
puts translate("chocolate cream")
#Should return "ocolatechay eamcray"
When I run this, Ruby just returns a blank line. So, to troubleshoot the issue, I loaded the definition into a repl. The repl returned the following error:
NoMethodError: undefined method `downcase' for #<RubyVM::InstructionSequence:0x000000016e8f88>
from /home/adc/odin-project/web-development-101/21-ruby-tdd/ruby_tdd_project/learn_ruby/04_pig_latin/pig_latin.rb:3:in `translate'
from /home/adc/.rvm/rubies/ruby-2.3.0/bin/irb:11:in `<main>'
If I remove downcase from my code, I get the same error message, only this time with split.
What's the problem here? (I'm pretty confident that downcase and split are not the problem.)
If returns a blank string because you don't return anything inside the collect! block. Return word and it will work :
def translate phrase
phrase = phrase.downcase.split(/ /)
phrase.collect! do |word|
word = word.split(//)
switched = false
while switched == false
word.each_index do |letter|
if word[letter] == ("a" || "e" || "i" || "o" || "u")
switched = true
word = (word[letter..-1] + word[0..(letter-1)]).join + "ay"
end
end
end
word
end
return phrase.join(" ")
end
puts translate("chocolate cream")
#=> atechocolay amcreay
It doesn't look like it's returning exactly what you expected, but it's still better than a blank string.
As for your weird error message in the console, it seems to be specific to the REPL (possibly because of the method name translate).
Update 1 (how I would write this code)
def translate phrase
phrase = phrase.downcase.split(/ /)
phrase.collect! do |word|
word = word.split(//)
word.each_index do |letter|
if ["a", "e", "i", "o", "u"].include?(word[letter])
if letter == 0
word = word[letter..-1].join + "ay"
else
word = (word[letter..-1] + word[0..(letter-1)]).join + "ay"
end
break
end
end
word
end
return phrase.join(" ")
end
puts translate("chocolate cream")
Update 2 (if I make some minor changes to your code to make it useful)
def translate phrase
phrase = phrase.downcase.split(/ /)
phrase.collect! do |word|
word = word.split(//)
switched = false
while switched == false
word.each_index do |letter|
if ["a", "e", "i", "o", "u"].include?(word[letter])
switched = true
if letter == 0
word = word[letter..-1].join + "ay"
else
word = (word[letter..-1] + word[0..(letter-1)]).join + "ay"
end
break
end
end
end
word
end
return phrase.join(" ")
end
puts translate("chocolate cream")
Explanation
"o"==("a" || "e" || "i" || "o" || "u")
and
"o"== "a" || "o" == "e" || "o" == "i" || "o" == "o" || "o" == "u"
statements are not the same. First one is false
(because ("a" || "e" || "i" || "o" || "u")=="a" and "o"!="a"), since the second one is true.
You need inner if statement
if letter == 0
word = word[letter..-1].join + "ay"
else
word = (word[letter..-1] + word[0..(letter-1)]).join + "ay"
end
because when word starts with any mentioned vowels then
word[letter..-1] + word[0..(letter-1)]
statement will return the whole word twice, cause letter will equal to 0.
And lastly you need to return word object after the while loop.
I am attempting to write a ruby function that takes in a string of words and turns it into Pig Latin. I am breaking the string into an array, and attempting to iterate over each element. When "eat pie" is put in, the result is "eat ie", but I am unsure why.
string = "eat pie"
array = string.split(" ")
array.map do |word|
if word[0].chr == "a" || word[0].chr == "e" || word[0].chr == "i" || word[0].chr == "o" || word[0].chr == "u"
word = word + "ay"
elsif word[1].chr == "a" || word[1].chr == "i" || word[1].chr == "o" || word[1].chr == "u"
temp = word[0]
word[0] = ""
word = word + temp
word = word + "ay"
elsif word[2].chr == "a" || word[2].chr == "i" || word[2].chr == "o" || word[2].chr == "u"
temp = word[0] + word[1]
word[0] = ""
word[0] = ""
word = word + temp
word = word + "ay"
else ## three consonants
temp = word[0] + word[1] + word[2]
word[0] = ""
word[0] = ""
word[0] = ""
word = word + temp
word = word + "ay"
end ## end of if statement
end ## end of iteration
puts array.join(" ")
Agree with the other answers supplied, here's a slightly less verbose version of your code in case it helps you.
input = 'pig latin is awesome'
arr = input.split(' ').map do |wrd|
if %w(a e i o u).include? wrd[0]
wrd + 'ay'
elsif %w(a i o u).include? wrd[1]
wrd[1..-1] + wrd[0] + 'ay'
elsif %w(a i o u).include? wrd[2]
wrd[2..-1] + wrd[0] + wrd[1] + 'ay'
else
wrd[3..-1] + wrd[0] + wrd[1] + wrd[2] + 'ay'
end
end.join(' ')
puts arr
The output you are seeing has 2 different causes:
1) In Ruby, Array.map returns a new array. It does not modify the array its iterating over. This is causing some of your modifications to the array to be lost.
From the Ruby docs:
Invokes the given block once for each element of self.
Creates a new array containing the values returned by the block.
You should either assign the result to a new variable, or use Array.map! instead, which will modify the contents of the array.
array = string.split(" ")
mapped = array.map do |word|
# ...
end
mapped.join(" ")
2) Although some of your modifications are being lost due to using map, you are making modifications to some strings in your array, which is why you are seeing eat ie, and not eat pie (missing a p).
To illustrate this problem, look a the follow code:
word = "pie"
word[0] = ""
puts word #=> "ie"
In Ruby, when you access the first character in a string (by using [0]), and assign a value to it, Ruby mutates that string, and does not return a new copy.
You should create a new string, instead of changing characters directly:
array.map do |word|
new_word = word.slice(1, word.length)
end
array.map does is not intended to mutate the array, so what you want to do is either newarray = array.map { ... } or array.map! do ... end.
Inside the loop, each word is a string object, that you are mutating by calling word[0] = "". By calling word = word + "ay" you are discarding the reference of the original string, but not overwriting it. It happens though that word = word + "ay" is the last statement executed in the block so it counts as return value for the block.
I bet you are still confused because overall is not that simple so you might probably want to read something about mutable and immutable objects and functional and imperative programming.
Hi I'm trying to write code for to convert strings to pig latin
def translate(str)
alpha = ('a'..'z').to_a
vowels = %w[a e i o u]
consonants = alpha - vowels
if vowels.include?(str[0])
str + 'ay'
elsif str[0..1] == 'qu'
str[2..-1]+'quay'
elsif consonants.include?(str[0]) && str[1..2]=='qu'
str[3..-1]+str[0..2]+'ay'
elsif consonants.include?(str[0]) && consonants.include?(str[1]) && consonants.include?(str[2])
str[3..-1] + str[0..2] + 'ay'
elsif consonants.include?(str[0]) && consonants.include?(str[1])
str[2..-1] + str[0..1] + 'ay'
elsif consonants.include?(str[0])
str[1..-1] + str[0] + 'ay'
elsif str[0..1] == 'qu'
str[2..-1]+'quay'
else
return str
end
end
This code works perfect for converting one word strings, for example: translate("monkey").
What i'm trying to do is make it possible for this code to accept multiple words as well (within the same string)...following the above criteria for converting into pig latin, example:
translate("please help") => "easeplay elphay"
thanks much!
Since you already know how to translate a single word why not just split up the task into two methods:
def translate(str)
str.split.map { |word| translate_word(word) }.join
end
def translate_word(str)
# Your old translate code here
end
What I would do for this is:
use the #split method to make your str variable into an array of words (or 1 word if its only 1 word).
afterwards you can use the array#each method to iterate through each array index.
i.e.
str = "hello"
str = str.split(" ") # str now equals ["hello"]
for multiple variables:
str = "hello world"
str- str.split(" ") #now equals ["hello", "world"]
then you can use the .each method:
str.each do |<variable name you want to use>|
<how you want to manipulate the array>
end
for the pig latin program you could do:
str.each do|element|
if vowels.include?(element)
<do whatever you want here>
elsif
<do whatever>
else
<do whatver>
end
end
this will iterate through each element in the array and translate it (if there is only one element it will still work)
Trying to write Method in ruby that will translate a string in pig-latin , the rule :
Rule 1: If a word begins with a vowel sound, add an "ay" sound to the end of the word.
Rule 2: If a word begins with a consonant sound, move it to the end of the word, and then add an "ay" sound to the end of the word and also when the word begins with 2 consonants , move both to the end of the word and add an "ay"
As a newbie , my prob is the second rule , when the word begin with only one consonant it work , but for more than one , I have trouble to make it work ,Can somebody look at the code and let me know how i can code that differently and probably what is my mistake , probably the code need refactoring. Thanks , so far i come up with this code :
def translate (str)
str1="aeiou"
str2=(/\A[aeiou]/)
vowel = str1.scan(/\w/)
alpha =('a'..'z').to_a
con = (alpha - vowel).join
word = str.scan(/\w/)
if #first rule
str =~ str2
str + "ay"
elsif # second rule
str != str2
s = str.slice!(/^./)
str + s + "ay"
elsif
word[0.1]=~(/\A[con]/)
s = str.slice!(/^../)
str + s + "ay"
else
word[0..2]=~(/\A[con]/)
s = str.slice!(/^.../)
str + s + "ay"
end
end
translate("apple") should == "appleay"
translate("cherry") should == "errychay"
translate("three") should == "eethray"
No need for all those fancy regexes. Keep it simple.
def translate str
alpha = ('a'..'z').to_a
vowels = %w[a e i o u]
consonants = alpha - vowels
if vowels.include?(str[0])
str + 'ay'
elsif consonants.include?(str[0]) && consonants.include?(str[1])
str[2..-1] + str[0..1] + 'ay'
elsif consonants.include?(str[0])
str[1..-1] + str[0] + 'ay'
else
str # return unchanged
end
end
translate 'apple' # => "appleay"
translate 'cherry' # => "errychay"
translate 'dog' # => "ogday"
This will handle multiple words, punctuation, and words like 'queer' = 'eerquay' and 'school' = 'oolschay'.
def translate (sent)
vowels = %w{a e i o u}
sent.gsub(/(\A|\s)\w+/) do |str|
str.strip!
while not vowels.include? str[0] or (str[0] == 'u' and str[-1] == 'q')
str += str[0]
str = str[1..-1]
end
str = ' ' + str + 'ay'
end.strip
end
okay this is an epic pig latin translator that I'm sure could use a bit of refactoring, but passes the tests
def translate(sent)
sent = sent.downcase
vowels = ['a', 'e', 'i', 'o', 'u']
words = sent.split(' ')
result = []
words.each_with_index do |word, i|
translation = ''
qu = false
if vowels.include? word[0]
translation = word + 'ay'
result.push(translation)
else
word = word.split('')
count = 0
word.each_with_index do |char, index|
if vowels.include? char
# handle words that start with 'qu'
if char == 'u' and translation[-1] == 'q'
qu = true
translation = words[i][count + 1..words[i].length] + translation + 'uay'
result.push(translation)
next
end
break
else
# handle words with 'qu' in middle
if char == 'q' and word[i+1] == 'u'
qu = true
translation = words[i][count + 2..words[i].length] + 'quay'
result.push(translation)
next
else
translation += char
end
count += 1
end
end
# translation of consonant words without qu
if not qu
translation = words[i][count..words[i].length] + translation + 'ay'
result.push(translation)
end
end
end
result.join(' ')
end
So this will give the following:
puts translate('apple') # "appleay"
puts translate("quiet") # "ietquay"
puts translate("square") # "aresquay"
puts translate("the quick brown fox") # "ethay ickquay ownbray oxfay"
def translate(sentence)
sentence.split(" ").map do |word|
word = word.gsub("qu", " ")
word.gsub!(/^([^aeiou]*)(.*)/,'\2\1ay')
word = word.gsub(" ", "qu")
end
end
That was fun! I don't like the hack for qu, but I couldn't find a nice way to do that.
So for this pig latin clearly I skipped and\an\in and singular things like a\I etc. I know that wasn't the main question but you can just leave out that logic if it's not for your use case. Also this goes for triple consonants if you want to keep it with one or two consonants then change the expression from {1,3} to {1,2}
All pig latin is similar so just alter for your use case. This is a good opportunity to use MatchData objects. Also vowel?(first_letter=word[0].downcase) is a style choice made to be more literate so I don't have to remember that word[0] is the first letter.
My answer is originally based off of Sergio Tulentsev's answer in this thread.
def to_pig_latin(sentence)
sentence.gsub('.','').split(' ').collect do |word|
translate word
end.compact.join(' ')
end
def translate(word)
if word.length > 1
if word == 'and' || word == 'an' || word == 'in'
word
elsif capture = consonant_expression.match(word)
capture.post_match.to_s + capture.to_s + 'ay'
elsif vowel?(first_letter=word[0].downcase)
word + 'ay'
elsif vowel?(last_letter=word[-1].downcase)
move_last_letter(word) + 'ay'
end
else
word
end
end
# Move last letter to beginning of word
def move_last_letter(word)
word[-1] + word[0..-2]
end
private
def consonant_expression
# at the beginning of a String
# capture anything not a vowel (consonants)
# capture 1, 2 or 3 occurences
# ignore case and whitespace
/^ [^aeiou] {1,3}/ix
end
def vowel?(letter)
vowels.include?(letter)
end
def vowels
%w[a e i o u]
end
Also just for the heck of it I'll include my dump from a pry session so you all can see how to use MatchData. MINSWAN. It's stuff like this that makes ruby great.
pry > def consonant_expression
pry * /^ [^aeiou] {1,3}/ix
pry * end
=> :consonant_expression
pry > consonant_expression.match('Stream')
=> #<MatchData "Str">
pry > capture = _
=> #<MatchData "Str">
pry > ls capture
MatchData#methods:
== begin end hash length offset pre_match regexp string to_s
[] captures eql? inspect names post_match pretty_print size to_a values_at
pry >
pry > capture.post_match
=> "eam"
pry > capture
=> #<MatchData "Str">
pry > capture.to_s
=> "Str"
pry > capture.post_match.to_s
=> "eam"
pry > capture.post_match.to_s + capture.to_s + 'ay'
=> "eamStray"
pry >
If I understood your question correctly, you can just directly check if a character is a vowel or consonant and then use array ranges to get the part of the string you want.
vowels = ['a', 'e', 'i', 'o', 'u']
consonants = ('a'..'z').to_a - vowels
return str + "ay" if vowels.include?(str[0])
if consonants.include?(str[0])
return str[2..-1] + str[0..1] + "ay" if consonants.include?(str[1])
return str[1..-1] + str[0] + "ay"
end
str
Here's a solution that handles the "qu" phoneme as well as other irregular characters. Had a little trouble putting the individual words back into a string with the proper spacing. Would appreciate any feedback!
def translate(str)
vowels = ["a", "e", "i", "o", "u"]
new_word = ""
str.split.each do |word|
vowel_idx = 0
if vowels.include? word[0]
vowel_idx = 0
elsif word.include? "qu"
until word[vowel_idx-2]+word[vowel_idx-1] == "qu"
vowel_idx += 1
end
else
until vowels.include? word[vowel_idx]
vowel_idx += 1
end
end
idx_right = vowel_idx
while idx_right < word.length
new_word += word[idx_right]
idx_right += 1
end
idx_left = 0
while idx_left < vowel_idx
new_word += word[idx_left]
idx_left += 1
end
new_word += "ay "
end
new_word.chomp(" ")
end
I done gone did one too
def translate(string)
vowels = %w{a e i o u}
phrase = string.split(" ")
phrase.map! do |word|
letters = word.split("")
find_vowel = letters.index do |letter|
vowels.include?(letter)
end
#turn "square" into "aresquay"
if letters[find_vowel] == "u"
find_vowel += 1
end
letters.rotate!(find_vowel)
letters.push("ay")
letters.join
end
return phrase.join(" ")
end
def piglatinize(word)
vowels = %w{a e i o u}
word.each_char do |chr|
index = word.index(chr)
if index != 0 && vowels.include?(chr.downcase)
consonants = word.slice!(0..index-1)
return word + consonants + "ay"
elsif index == 0 && vowels.include?(chr.downcase)
return word + "ay"
end
end
end
def to_pig_latin(sentence)
sentence.split(" ").collect { |word| piglatinize(word) }.join(" ")
end
This seems to handle all that I've thrown at it including the 'qu' phoneme rule...
def translate str
letters = ('a'..'z').to_a
vowels = %w[a e i o u]
consonants = letters - vowels
str2 = str.gsub(/\w+/) do|word|
if vowels.include?(word.downcase[0])
word+'ay'
elsif (word.include? 'qu')
idx = word.index(/[aeio]/)
word = word[idx, word.length-idx] + word[0,idx]+ 'ay'
else
idx = word.index(/[aeiou]/)
word = word[idx, word.length-idx] + word[0,idx]+'ay'
end
end
end
I'm grabbing the words with the 'qu' phoneme and then checking all the other vowels [excluding u].
Then I split the word by the index of the first vowel (or vowel without 'u' for the 'qu' cases) and dropping the word part before that index to the back of the word. And adding 'ay' ftw.
Many of the examples here are fairly long. Here's some relatively short code I came up with. It handles all cases including the "qu" problem! Feedback always appreciated (I'm pretty new to coding).
$vowels = "aeiou"
#First, I define a method that handle's a word starting with a consonant
def consonant(s)
n = 0
while n < s.length
if $vowels.include?(s[n]) && s[n-1..n] != "qu"
return "#{s[n..-1]}#{s[0..n-1]}ay"
else
n += 1
end
end
end
#Then, I write the main translate method that decides how to approach the word.
def translate(s)
s.split.map{ |s| $vowels.include?(s[0]) ? "#{s}ay" : consonant(s) }.join(" ")
end