I am trying to understand how to generate scanner generator using flex.
Let's say I successfully write my flex file. I have txt file which will be treated as input file. I want this file to be modified by deleting some patterns which are defined in flex file. I was able to:
flex myscanner.l in terminal
I got my flex.yy.c file
Then gcc -Wall -c lex.yy.c (2 warnings) Created lex.yy.o
Now I don’t know how to create my a.out file and create my new file after going through scanner which will do changes in the original.(yyout?)
I would be grateful for helping me finish this.
Related
I am working on some (very) low level programming but not everything is completely clear to me. I start by creating a .cpp (or .c) file which is run through gcc to create an elf or object file but what is an object file? I get object files when I use the "as" compiler but how are these used and what is the purpose of having an object file when we could have a straight binary?
There is a very clear explanation of this question on the this site. I pasted it down below as well. But I strongly suggest you take a look at the diagram on the website. That will give you a much better high-level understanding of what is going on.
Compiling a source code file in C++ is a four-step process. For example, if you have a C++ source code file named prog1.cpp and you execute the compile command
g++ -Wall -ansi -o prog1 prog1.cpp
the compilation process looks like this:
The C++ preprocessor copies the contents of the included header files into the source code file, generates macro code, and replaces symbolic constants defined using #define with their values.
The expanded source code file produced by the C++ preprocessor is compiled into the assembly language for the platform.
The assembler code generated by the compiler is assembled into the object code for the platform.
The object code file generated by the assembler is linked together with the object code files for any library functions used to produce an executable file.
By using appropriate compiler options, we can stop this process at any stage.
To stop the process after the preprocessor step, you can use the -E option:
g++ -E prog1.cpp
The expanded source code file will be printed on standard output (the screen by default); you can redirect the output to a file if you wish. Note that the expanded source code file is often incredibly large - a 20 line source code file can easily produce an expanded file of 20,000 lines or more, depending on which header files were included.
To stop the process after the compile step, you can use the -S option:
g++ -Wall -ansi -S prog1.cpp
By default, the assembler code for a source file named filename.cpp will be placed in a file named filename.s.
To stop the process after the assembly step, you can use the -c option:
g++ -Wall -ansi -c prog1.cpp
By default, the assembler code for a source file named filename.cpp will be placed in a file named filename.o
I am trying to include MPI compiler to my makefile. The makefile is already prepared such that I only need to include the address of the MPI compiler in a a separate env file. However doing so does not work. I can get the cpp file to run manually by typing:
mpicxx Demo_00.cpp -o aprogram
./aprogram
I test where the mpi compiler is located using:
which mpicxx
/usr/bin/mpicxx
In the env file the corresponding line is:
MPICXX=/usr/bin/mpicxx
However, when I try to 'make' he cpp file I get the following error:
make Demo_00
g++ Demo_00.cpp -o Demo_00
Demo_00.cpp:2:17: fatal error: mpi.h: No such file or directory
compilation terminated.
make: *** [Demo_00] Error 1
The cpp file is in the same folder as the env file and the makefile.
I am not quite sure how to identify the error.
Thank you for your help,
Tartaglia
If you want to change the name of the C++ compiler, you have to change the variable CXX. That's the default variable make uses when it wants to compile C++ code.
This line in your log file:
g++ Demo_00.cpp -o Demo_00
says that you are using g++ compiler instead of mpixx.
Usually in makefiles compiler definition is at the beginnig of the file and looks like this:
CC=g++
just change it to mpixx
CC=mpixx
Thank you all for your responses, I took a closer look into the makefile I thought I was using and it turns out, as you have already suggested, I was not using it at all. The makefile was only able to execute one specific cpp file with one specific name. So whenever I typed in make *.cpp I was using the standard make as you already pointed out.
Thanks again for your help.
I have a legacy code written using fortran 77. I'm trying to build it with gfortran. But I seem to be failing at the stage where I include the libraries in the build. The dozens of *.f source files compile fine, but when they are being linked, I get a bunch of "undefined reference" errors all relating to subroutines and functions that are defined in my libraries. I already ran the makefile for the libraries first, so the variables I need should all be exported. I'm playing with the "-L" option, but can't get it to work as desired.
First, here's my syntax of the linking line in my makefile:
29 $(PROGRAM): $(SRCS) $(LIBS)
30 $(FC) $(FLFLAGS) -o $# $+ -L$(DIRLIB)
PROGRAM is the program name, SRCS are all the compiled source files, LIBS is set to two different files - an archive file (file.a) and a file.o file.
FC is gfortran, I don't have any specific linking flags for FLFLAGS as of now, and DIRLIB is the main directory of the libraries.
The thing is that my *.o files that resulted from building my librarires don't reside in just the main directory, DIRLIB. DIRLIB contains several directories, all with their own *.o files that are needed by my code.
I tried adding each individual directory after the -L option (e.g. DIRLIB/DIR1/*.o DIRLIB/DIR2/*.o DIRLIB/DIR3/*.o), but I eventually start getting errors that some subroutines are multiply defined.
All this business of user-defined libraries and archive files just confuses me and I'm pretty new to making makefiles in the first place, so I'm just taking a shot in the dark here that somebody might be able to help me shed some light on this.
Libraries need to come after the .o files that reference them in the linking command.
I'm guessing the object file in LIBS comes after the library, but needs some of the procedures from it. Can you show the command that is actually run (with all variables expanded), to confirm this?
I tried to build this code again using the library. It worked this time. I'm pretty sure I'm doing the same thing in my makefile as I did before, so it must be related to the library I had. Maybe somebody altered it along the way and inadvertently broke it. But I got a fresh clean copy of the library. My steps are to:
1) run the makefile for the library source files; it creates a library.a archive file
2) run my code makefile:
it has a line to specify the location of this archive file and assign it to "DIRLIB"
DIRLIB := ../library
then the linking command of the makefile becomes
$(FC) $(FLFLAGS) -o $# $+ -L$(DIRLIB) -lskit
FC is my compiler, FLFLAGS are my linking flags, -L is the option specifying the location of libraries to be included and -lskit is a crucial option which appears to allow the use of F77 libraries... without the -lskit option, I get many undefined reference errors. It may have been that last time I was not including this -lskit option at the end.
Everybody
I have a small problem . I just doing it for experiment. I'm using ubuntu 10.04
my problem is that my c program name 2.c is at /home/Desktop (location) but my .o files are at different location /tmp/man(location of 3.o) /usr/jan(location of 4.o)
I complied the program form home account by command
gcc"/home/Desktop/2.c""/tmp/man/3.0"/usr/jan/4.0 "
but every time i compile the program it shows error like that
bash: gcc/home/Desktop/2.c/tmp/man/3.0: No such file or directory.
what I'm doing wrong ?
can any body what is the proper way to run the program
one request please don't tell to paste the all file in same folder than use gcc or changind ld_library path .
if You are giving me suggestion about makefile than please give the complete make file .
just tell me how i can compile and run the program ?
First, don't use " to separate the arguments, use spaces. Also, you wrote 3.0 and 4.0 (with zero, not oh). Then, do you want to compile the 2.c file and link it with the 3.o and 4.o files ? You just have to call
> gcc /home/Desktop/2.c /tmp/man/3.o /usr/jan/4.o -o /your/path/exefile
This will compile 2.c, link it with 3.o and 4.o and build the exefile executable in the specified path.
Try
$ gcc /home/Desktop/2.c /tmp/man/3.o /usr/jan/4.o
Why on earth do you have .o files in /tmp/man?
I'm building ubuntu-8.04 with gcc 3.4 and I need to generate the .i files, which are the output of the gcc preprocessor. I have tried adding the --save-temps flag but this only generates the .i files for the top level directory, i.e. source, and does not seem to get passed recursively to the child directories. I also tried the -E flag, which is supposed to output preprocessed files and stop compilation, but this did not generate the files either.
I'm specifically looking to generate the .i files for the source in net/core.
Any help is appreciated. Thanks!!
There is no support for bulk preprocessing.
For single file use "make net/core/foo.i"
For bulk, workaround is "make C=2 CHECK="cc -E"".
I know that is an old post, but maybe can be useful; for me this works:
gcc -E filename.c -o outputfile.i