I have successfully been able to use tokensregex for rule-based named entity recognition but want to increase the accuracy by adding gazetteers as an additional layer.
My data is not actually in a file but in a map that looks like:
{"China" =["shanghai","Beijing","Gonzo,"....], "United Kingdom" = ["London", "Manchester","Edinburgh",...]} where the key is the country name and value is the corresponding cities.
Can I use this format i.e a map or do I need to have a tsv file with location name and the LOCATION tag?
How do I use the Gazetteer annotation with tokensregex?
Also since tokesnregex looks at one token at a time how do I match multi token words like New York in the gazetteer?
You could try running the regexner annotator as a first layer to perform dictionary based look up. This allows for tagging sequences of tokens with a particular NER tag using a dictionary.
Documentation here: https://nlp.stanford.edu/software/regexner.html
Related
I have a marketing email in which I want to include some contact information dynamically, but I would like to encrypt it.
In my example, I have a button with a query string containing contact information that I would like to encrypt/obfuscate.
So far I have looked into two options:
Use handlebars to apply transformations
Add a new calculated field to the Contact
From the reading I have done, neither option is possible due to current limitations because:
I cannot add custom Handlebar helper functions to emails
Calculated fields are limited in terms of the operations that can be used
How can I do this?
Resources:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dynamics365/customerengagement/on-premises/customize/define-calculated-fields?view=op-9-1#calculated-field-functions-syntax
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dynamics365-release-plan/2022wave1/marketing/dynamics365-marketing/win-customer-attention-creating-conditional-dynamic-content-easy-to-use-no-code-experiences
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dynamics365/marketing/conditional-content
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dynamics365/marketing/dynamic-email-content#conditional-statements-and-comparisons
https://community.dynamics.com/365/marketing/f/dynamics-365-for-marketing-forum/395868/custom-code-in-marketing-email-for-multi-optionset
https://experience.dynamics.com/ideas/idea/?ideaid=1fe77cd1-7cca-ea11-bf22-0003ff68edf5
The problem:
I have a CSV file. I want to read from it, and use one of the values in it based on the content of my flow file. My flow file will be XML. I want to read the key using EvaluateXPath into an attribute, then use that key to read the corresponding value from the CSV file and put that into a flow file attribute.
I tried following this:
https://community.hortonworks.com/questions/174144/lookuprecord-and-simplecsvfilelookupservice-in-nif.html
but found requiring several controller services, including a CSV writer to be a big more than I would think is required to solve this.
Since you're working with attributes (and only one lookup value), you can skip the record-based stuff and just use LookupAttribute with a SimpleCsvFileLookupService.
The record-based components are for doing multiple lookups per record and/or lookups for each record in a FlowFile. In your case it looks like you have one "record" and you really just want to look up an attribute from another attribute for the entire FlowFile, so the above solution should be more straightforward and easier to configure.
I'm using the Google Places API endpoint "findplacefromtext" and tried a search similar to the example.
https://maps.googleapis.com/maps/api/place/findplacefromtext/json?input=mongolian%20grill&inputtype=textquery&fields=photos,formatted_address,name,opening_hours,rating&locationbias=circle:2000#47.6918452,-122.2226413&key=YOUR_API_KEY
However, when you use this it only ever returns one result. There is a cafe near me that's called "Cream" but when you pass that as the "input" parameter it returns shops that have a category of "Ice Cream". I thought it should only search the name of the business.... If I can't find the place by name does it search the category type as a fall back? When I execute the same search in Google Maps it returns the same data but I get multiple results and I can see the place I am trying to retrieve 3rd on the search result list.
Is it possible to make it return more than one result? The documentation doesn't mention anything about this.
I believe what you need is the Text Search request. The Find Place request is meant for exact addresses.
The Google Places API Text Search Service is a web service that
returns information about a set of places based on a string — for
example "pizza in New York" or "shoe stores near Ottawa" or "123 Main
Street". The service responds with a list of places matching the text
string and any location bias that has been set.
The service is especially useful for making ambiguous address queries
in an automated system, and non-address components of the string may
match businesses as well as addresses. Examples of ambiguous address
queries are incomplete addresses, poorly formatted addresses, or a
request that includes non-address components such as business names.
Taken from https://developers.google.com/maps/documentation/places/web-service/search#TextSearchRequests
FHIR stu3
tried this:
http://fhirtest.uhn.ca/baseDstu3/PlanDefinition/20630?_revinclude=ActivityDefinition
based on the example from :
http://build.fhir.org/search.html#include
but it returned 400 Bad Request
thanks
There are 4 issues with your syntax:
_revinclude is a parameter for the search operation. Searches use the "type" endpoint (i.e. [base]/[resource]). Your format is for a read ([base]/[resource]/[id]). Reads only return a single resource, not a bundle and they don't take most parameters (you can do _format, but that's about it)
_revinclude needs to identify both the resource and the search parameter. E.g. ActivityDefinition:plandefinition, not just ActivityDefinition
The reference in the resources isn't from ActivityDefinition to PlanDefinition, but from PlanDefinition to ActivityDefinition. So you don't actually need a reverse-include. A simple _include is what you need given that your focus is already PlanDefinition
There's no standard search parameter on PlanDefinition to search based on ActivityDefinitions - and both _include and _revinclude are based on search parameters (because that's what servers index).
Because of the 4th issue, you're not going to be able to execute this test against any of the public test servers - unless you make special arrangements, they only support core search criteria. However, on your own system, you're free to define your own search criteria. If you were to do that, you ought to be able to make the query work using the following url:
[base]/PlanDefinition?_id=20630&_include=activitydefinition
(Assuming that you've named your custom search criteria having a path of PlanDefinition.activity.activityDefinition as having a name of "activitydefinition")
I have a REST service /accounts which returns all the accounts data (Number, Name).
Requirement :
Should Support the below search/filter pattern with any combination of "And" or "OR" rather than retruning the entire collection.
startsWith
endsWith
Contains
Question 1 : Are these below API design correct(RESTful) or any better way to do the same
e.g -
/accounts?name^My Account 123**or**number~ACC1234
(^"==> Starts with , "~"==> ends with)
/accounts?name^My Account 123**and**number~ACC1234
(^"==> Starts with "~"==> ends with)
/accounts?name$ACC123
($ ==> account collection contains ACC123)
Spring Controller:
Planning to get these Filter (Query Parameter) pattern as #RequestParam and have a Regex to parse the pattern and then apply & retrieve it from the data store. The downside is any new filter pattern would need a change in the Controller class.
Question 2: Is there any out of the box features available in Spring 3 to do search / filter from a collection?
Thanks!
From a design perspective, using Query parameters to specify search / filter parameters is fine. However, for more complex cases such as yours, I typically define a new end point, that only deals with searches.
As an example, if my logic for search is strictly "or" and "contains", I would define a book search as such:
GET /books/?author=john&keywords=how%20to%20use%20spring
Here, my API is strictly going to search for books where the author's name contains "john" and the words "how to use spring" appear in the content. The Search logic stays consistent, and the client has no flexibility.
In your case, if the client has the ability to specific their own search criteria, you need to build out a new end point, something like:
POST /books/search
And in the request body, post your own search criteria DSL like name^My Account 123**and**number~ACC1234