I need to check if an byte[] entity attribute contains an string. I tried everything I found but Linq seems to be pretty tight and doesn't allow me to use my custom methods so any idea?
I tried converting the string (Content) to byte array an then using a custom method check if my entity attribute (x.Document) contains the string converted(ContentBytes) with no success due to linq seems that it doesn't allow you to use methods it can't convert to plain SQL so I dont know how to get it.
using (GPC container = new GPC()) {
var p = from t in ...
select t;
if (Content != null) {
byte[] ContentBytes = System.Text.Encoding.ASCII.GetBytes(Content);
p = p.Where(x => this.CheckPatternInArray(x.Document, ContentBytes) == true);
}
private bool CheckPatternInArray(byte[] array, byte[] pattern) {
int fidx = 0;
int result = Array.FindIndex(array, 0, array.Length, (byte b) => {
fidx = (b == pattern[fidx]) ? fidx + 1 : 0;
return (fidx == pattern.Length);
});
return (result >= pattern.Length - 1);
}
Any idea?
In the comparison can you do other way around? I mean, if you know the encoding then u can convert the x.Document to string. Then comparing the string will be very easy.
System.Text.UTF8Encoding enc = new System.Text.UTF8Encoding();
string s = enc.GetString(x.Document);
You don't need o write a extension function.
As for creating an extension method, here is one I made to make it easier to inspect the progress of a linq expression:
public static class LinqUtilities
{
/// <summary>
/// Inject this in your Linq chains to inspect each item as it is processed.
///
/// The item can be changed during the "tap" operation, but a new item cannot be created
///
/// Use this for logging or for in-line audits (summaries, secondary list creation...) or anything else that catches your fancy!
/// </summary>
/// <typeparam name="T"></typeparam>
/// <param name="this"></param>
/// <param name="tapper">function to observe the current object</param>
/// <returns></returns>
public static IEnumerable<T> Tap<T>(this IEnumerable<T> #this, Action<T> tapper)
{
foreach (var item in #this)
{
tapper(item);
yield return item;
}
}
}
Here is some PSEUDO-CODE to give an idea of what I'm thinking. I make no promises that it will compile, much less run. But it should point you in the right direction for your original question.
I declare 4 arrays; one that has the values we want to check for, and three test arrays. Then I run the expression against each array to show what the output would be.
char[] toCheck = {'a', 'b', 'c', 'd'};
char[] hasAll = {'a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e', 'f', 'g'};
char[] hasSome = {'c', 'd', 'e', 'f', 'g'};
char[] hasNone = {'e', 'f', 'g'};
// verify the linq expression works by comparing against the different arrays
char[] foundList = toCheck.Except(v => hasAll.indexOf(v) >= 0);
// foundList.count == 0
foundList = toCheck.Except(v => hasSome.indexOf(v) >= 0);
// foundList.count == 2
foundList = toCheck.Except(v => hasNone.indexOf(v) >= 0);
// foundList.count == 0
Related
public static IQueryable<SearchProfile> FilterData(string Filter, Repository<SearchProfileContext> dc)
{
IQueryable<SearchProfile> data = null;
var predicate = PredicateBuilder.True<SearchProfile>();
Filter = ExcludedParam(Filter);
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(Filter))`enter code here`
{
var stringToSplit = Filter;`enter code here`
List<string[]> arrays = new List<string[]>();
var primeArray = stringToSplit.Split('|');
for (int i = 0; i < primeArray.Length; i++)
{
string first = primeArray[i];
if (first.Contains("chkOrientation") == true)
{
string[] Array = first.Replace("chkOrientation=", "").Split(',');
predicate = predicate.And(a => Array.Contains(a.OrientaionID.ToString()));
}
if (first.Contains("chkProfession") == true)
{
string[] Array = first.Replace("chkProfession=", "").Split(',');
**predicate = predicate.And(a => Array.Contains(SqlFunctions.StringConvert((Double)a.ProfessionID)));**
}
}
data = dc.Select<SearchProfile>().Where(predicate).Distinct();
return data;
}
data = (from a in dc.Select<SearchProfile>().Where(a => a.PersonID > 0) select a).Distinct();
return data;
}
When I ran my program, I got this nasty error below:
LINQ to Entities does not recognize the method Int32 ToInteger(System.Object) method, and this method cannot be translated into a store expression.
then,I used SqlFunctions.StringConvert to make it work but the SQL LINQ generated was not evaluating. This is the sample output (it is comparing '1' and '2' instead of 1 and 2)**
Why are you casting a.ProfessionID to double? What type is a.ProfessionID of?
I think there is implicit conversion to integer, which causes calling the ToInteger method.
And why don't you convert items in Array to integer in the first place, and then use Array of ints in the query?
I need to filter the ObservableCollection using LINQ Where clause in my Silverlight application.
The object type is dynamically created using method provided in following url.
http://mironabramson.com/blog/post/2008/06/Create-you-own-new-Type-and-use-it-on-run-time-(C).aspx
Is filtering my collection using Where clause for specific property possible?
How can I achieve it?
Thanks
The only way I know is using reflection, like this:
// using a list of dynamic types
var items = new List<object> { new { A = 0, B = 1 }, new { A = 1, C = 0 } };
// select ao items with A > 0
var filteredItems = items.Where(obj => (int)obj.GetType().GetField("A").GetValue(obj) > 0).ToArray();
// if you have a property instead of field, you should call GetProperty(), like this:
obj.GetType().GetProperty("PropertyName").GetValue(obj, null)
As you know the element type of your collection only at run time it probably is object at compile time. So the argument to the .Where method has to be a Func<object, bool>.
Here's a piece of code that will create such a delegate given a property of the actual element type and a lambda expression on the property (which i suppose you know the type of):
/// <summary>
/// Get a predicate for a property on a parent element.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="property">The property of the parent element to get the value for.</param>
/// <param name="propertyPredicate">The predicate on the property value.</param>
static Func<object, bool> GetPredicate<TProperty>(PropertyInfo property, Expression<Func<TProperty, bool>> propertyPredicate)
{
if (property.PropertyType != typeof(TProperty)) throw new ArgumentException("Bad property type.");
var pObj = Expression.Parameter(typeof(object), "obj");
// ((elementType)obj).property;
var xGetPropertyValue = Expression.Property(Expression.Convert(pObj, property.DeclaringType), property);
var pProperty = propertyPredicate.Parameters[0];
// obj => { var pProperty = xGetPropertyValue; return propertyPredicate.Body; };
var lambda = Expression.Lambda<Func<object, bool>>(Expression.Block(new[] { pProperty }, Expression.Assign(pProperty, xGetPropertyValue), propertyPredicate.Body), pObj);
return lambda.Compile();
}
Sample usage:
var items = new List<object> { new { A = 0, B = "Foo" }, new { A = 1, B = "Bar" }, new { A = 2, B = "FooBar" } };
var elementType = items[0].GetType();
Console.WriteLine("Items where A >= 1:");
foreach (var item in items.Where(GetPredicate<int>(elementType.GetProperty("A"), a => a >= 1)))
Console.WriteLine(item);
Console.WriteLine();
Console.WriteLine("Items where B starts with \"Foo\":");
foreach (var item in items.Where(GetPredicate<string>(elementType.GetProperty("B"), b => b.StartsWith("Foo"))))
Console.WriteLine(item);
Output:
Items where A >= 1:
{ A = 1, B = Bar }
{ A = 2, B = FooBar }
Items where B starts with "Foo":
{ A = 0, B = Foo }
{ A = 2, B = FooBar }
While looking though some code of the project I'm working on, I've come across a pretty hefty method which does
the following:
public string DataField(int id, string fieldName)
{
var data = _dataRepository.Find(id);
if (data != null)
{
if (data.A == null)
{
data.A = fieldName;
_dataRepository.InsertOrUpdate(data);
return "A";
}
if (data.B == null)
{
data.B = fieldName;
_dataRepository.InsertOrUpdate(data);
return "B";
}
// keep going data.C through data.Z doing the exact same code
}
}
Obviously having 26 if statements just to determine if a property is null and then to update that property and do a database call is
probably very naive in implementation. What would be a better way of doing this unit of work?
Thankfully C# is able to inspect and assign class members dynamically, so one option would be to create a map list and iterate over that.
public string DataField(int id, string fieldName)
{
var data = _dataRepository.Find(id);
List<string> props = new List<string>();
props.Add("A");
props.Add("B");
props.Add("C");
if (data != null)
{
Type t = typeof(data).GetType();
foreach (String entry in props) {
PropertyInfo pi = t.GetProperty(entry);
if (pi.GetValue(data) == null) {
pi.SetValue(data, fieldName);
_dataRepository.InsertOrUpdate(data);
return entry;
}
}
}
}
You could just loop through all the character from 'A' to 'Z'. It gets difficult because you want to access an attribute of your 'data' object with the corresponding name, but that should (as far as I know) be possible through the C# reflection functionality.
While you get rid of the consecutive if-statements this still won't make your code nice :P
there is a fancy linq solution for your problem using reflection:
but as it was said before: your datastructure is not very well thought through
public String DataField(int id, string fieldName)
{
var data = new { Z = "test", B="asd"};
Type p = data.GetType();
var value = (from System.Reflection.PropertyInfo fi
in p.GetProperties().OrderBy((fi) => fi.Name)
where fi.Name.Length == 1 && fi.GetValue(data, null) != null
select fi.Name).FirstOrDefault();
return value;
}
ta taaaaaaaaa
like that you get the property but the update is not yet done.
var data = _dataRepository.Find(id);
If possible, you should use another DataType without those 26 properties. That new DataType should have 1 property and the Find method should return an instance of that new DataType; then, you could get rid of the 26 if in a more natural way.
To return "A", "B" ... "Z", you could use this:
return (char)65; //In this example this si an "A"
And work with some transformation from data.Value to a number between 65 and 90 (A to Z).
Since you always set the lowest alphabet field first and return, you can use an additional field in your class that tracks the first available field. For example, this can be an integer lowest_alphabet_unset and you'd update it whenever you set data.{X}:
Init:
lowest_alphabet_unset = 0;
In DataField:
lowest_alphabet_unset ++;
switch (lowest_alphabet_unset) {
case 1:
/* A is free */
/* do something */
return 'A';
[...]
case 7:
/* A through F taken */
data.G = fieldName;
_dataRepository.InsertOrUpdate(data);
return 'G';
[...]
}
N.B. -- do not use, if data is object rather that structure.
what comes to my mind is that, if A-Z are all same type, then you could theoretically access memory directly to check for non null values.
start = &data;
for (i = 0; i < 26; i++){
if ((typeof_elem) *(start + sizeof(elem)*i) != null){
*(start + sizeof(elem)*i) = fieldName;
return (char) (65 + i);
}
}
not tested but to give an idea ;)
Okay first to explain the rules:
I need a function that constructs a delegate matching any delegate type that encapsulates a body of which invokes a delegate of type (Object) (Object[] args) with 'args' containing all of the arguments passed to the original delegate during invocation.
My work so far:
delegate void TestDelegate(int x, int y);
delegate object TestDelegate2(object[] args);
static void Main(string[] sargs)
{
TestDelegate d = (TestDelegate)CreateAnonymousFromType(typeof(TestDelegate));
object ret = d.DynamicInvoke(2, 6);
if (ret != null) { Console.WriteLine(ret); }
Console.ReadKey();
}
static void SpecialInvoke(int x, int y)
{
Console.WriteLine("x: {0}\r\ny: {1}", x, y);
}
static Delegate CreateAnonymousFromType(Type type)
{
MethodInfo method = type.GetMethod("Invoke");
TestDelegate2 _delegate = new TestDelegate2(
delegate(object[] args)
{
Console.WriteLine("x: {0}\r\ny: {1}", args[0], args[1]);
return "This is the return";
});
var typeargs = CreateArgs(method.GetParameters());
var argindex = -1;
var tmp = Expression.Parameter(typeof(Object), "tmp");
var index = Expression.Parameter(typeof(int), "index");
var length = Expression.Constant(typeargs.Length);
var _break = Expression.Label("breakto");
var delegateargs = Expression.Parameter(typeof(object[]), "args");
return Expression.Lambda(
type,
Expression.Block(
new[] { tmp, index, delegateargs },
Expression.Assign(index, Expression.Constant(0)),
Expression.Assign(delegateargs, Expression.NewArrayBounds(typeof(Object), length)),
Expression.Loop(
Expression.IfThenElse(Expression.LessThan(index, length),
Expression.Block(
Expression.Assign(tmp, Expression.Convert(typeargs[++argindex], typeof(Object))),
Expression.Assign(Expression.ArrayAccess(delegateargs, index), tmp),
Expression.PostIncrementAssign(index)
),
Expression.Break(_break)
),
_break
),
Expression.Call(_delegate.Method, delegateargs)
),
typeargs
).Compile();
}
static ParameterExpression[] CreateArgs(ParameterInfo[] _params)
{
ParameterExpression[] ret = new ParameterExpression[_params.Length];
for (int i = 0; i < ret.Length; i++)
ret[i] = Expression.Parameter(_params[i].ParameterType, _params[i].Name);
return ret;
}
Now this SORTA works... I only get the value of typeargs[0] passed to the delegate "TestDelegate2" for both parameters x and y, the 'args' parameter at runtime is object[] { 2, 2 } and I can't for the life of me find a way to increment "argindex" inside the scope of the argument iteration... parameter count at compile time is indefinate.
Anybody know how I can solve this?
I've tried just copying the argument array using Expression.NewArrayInit(typeof(Object), typeargs) but that fails saying it can't use Int32 to initialize an array of Object
I've also tried this:
var arguments = Expression.Constant(typeargs);
And accessing the value of "arguments" at "index", however this produces the strings "x" and "y" .. apparently the names of the arguments and not their values.
This is honestly my first major attempt at using expression trees so any help.. no matter how little. Would be appreciated.
Thank you.
I think you were on the right track with Expression.NewArrayInit. You can fix the "An expression of type 'System.Int32' cannot be used to initialize an array of type 'System.Object'" error by using Expression.Convert to insert a conversion for each parameter:
var typeargs = CreateArgs(method.GetParameters());
return Expression.Lambda(
type,
Expression.Call(_delegate.Method, Expression.NewArrayInit(typeof(object),
typeargs.Select(arg => Expression.Convert(arg, typeof(object)))
)),
typeargs
).Compile();
I want to do this:
var orderBy = "Nome, Cognome desc";
var timb = time.Timbratures.Include("Anagrafica_Dipendente")
.Where(p => p.CodDipendente == 1);
if(orderBy != "")
timb = timb.OrderBy(orderBy);
Is there an OrderBy overload available that accepts a string parameter?
If you are using plain LINQ-to-objects and don't want to take a dependency on an external library it is not hard to achieve what you want.
The OrderBy() clause accepts a Func<TSource, TKey> that gets a sort key from a source element. You can define the function outside the OrderBy() clause:
Func<Item, Object> orderByFunc = null;
You can then assign it to different values depending on the sort criteria:
if (sortOrder == SortOrder.SortByName)
orderByFunc = item => item.Name;
else if (sortOrder == SortOrder.SortByRank)
orderByFunc = item => item.Rank;
Then you can sort:
var sortedItems = items.OrderBy(orderByFunc);
This example assumes that the source type is Item that have properties Name and Rank.
Note that in this example TKey is Object to not constrain the property types that can be sorted on. If the func returns a value type (like Int32) it will get boxed when sorting and that is somewhat inefficient. If you can constrain TKey to a specific value type you can work around this problem.
Absolutely. You can use the LINQ Dynamic Query Library, found on Scott Guthrie's blog. There's also an updated version available on CodePlex.
It lets you create OrderBy clauses, Where clauses, and just about everything else by passing in string parameters. It works great for creating generic code for sorting/filtering grids, etc.
var result = data
.Where(/* ... */)
.Select(/* ... */)
.OrderBy("Foo asc");
var query = DbContext.Data
.Where(/* ... */)
.Select(/* ... */)
.OrderBy("Foo ascending");
Another solution from codeConcussion (https://stackoverflow.com/a/7265394/2793768)
var param = "Address";
var pi = typeof(Student).GetProperty(param);
var orderByAddress = items.OrderBy(x => pi.GetValue(x, null));
The simplest & the best solution:
mylist.OrderBy(s => s.GetType().GetProperty("PropertyName").GetValue(s));
You don't need an external library for this. The below code works for LINQ to SQL/entities.
/// <summary>
/// Sorts the elements of a sequence according to a key and the sort order.
/// </summary>
/// <typeparam name="TSource">The type of the elements of <paramref name="query" />.</typeparam>
/// <param name="query">A sequence of values to order.</param>
/// <param name="key">Name of the property of <see cref="TSource"/> by which to sort the elements.</param>
/// <param name="ascending">True for ascending order, false for descending order.</param>
/// <returns>An <see cref="T:System.Linq.IOrderedQueryable`1" /> whose elements are sorted according to a key and sort order.</returns>
public static IQueryable<TSource> OrderBy<TSource>(this IQueryable<TSource> query, string key, bool ascending = true)
{
if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(key))
{
return query;
}
var lambda = (dynamic)CreateExpression(typeof(TSource), key);
return ascending
? Queryable.OrderBy(query, lambda)
: Queryable.OrderByDescending(query, lambda);
}
private static LambdaExpression CreateExpression(Type type, string propertyName)
{
var param = Expression.Parameter(type, "x");
Expression body = param;
foreach (var member in propertyName.Split('.'))
{
body = Expression.PropertyOrField(body, member);
}
return Expression.Lambda(body, param);
}
(CreateExpression copied from https://stackoverflow.com/a/16208620/111438)
I did so:
using System.Linq.Expressions;
namespace System.Linq
{
public static class LinqExtensions
{
public static IOrderedQueryable<TSource> OrderBy<TSource>(this IQueryable<TSource> source, string field, string dir = "asc")
{
// parametro => expressão
var parametro = Expression.Parameter(typeof(TSource), "r");
var expressao = Expression.Property(parametro, field);
var lambda = Expression.Lambda(expressao, parametro); // r => r.AlgumaCoisa
var tipo = typeof(TSource).GetProperty(field).PropertyType;
var nome = "OrderBy";
if (string.Equals(dir, "desc", StringComparison.InvariantCultureIgnoreCase))
{
nome = "OrderByDescending";
}
var metodo = typeof(Queryable).GetMethods().First(m => m.Name == nome && m.GetParameters().Length == 2);
var metodoGenerico = metodo.MakeGenericMethod(new[] { typeof(TSource), tipo });
return metodoGenerico.Invoke(source, new object[] { source, lambda }) as IOrderedQueryable<TSource>;
}
public static IOrderedQueryable<TSource> ThenBy<TSource>(this IOrderedQueryable<TSource> source, string field, string dir = "asc")
{
var parametro = Expression.Parameter(typeof(TSource), "r");
var expressao = Expression.Property(parametro, field);
var lambda = Expression.Lambda<Func<TSource, string>>(expressao, parametro); // r => r.AlgumaCoisa
var tipo = typeof(TSource).GetProperty(field).PropertyType;
var nome = "ThenBy";
if (string.Equals(dir, "desc", StringComparison.InvariantCultureIgnoreCase))
{
nome = "ThenByDescending";
}
var metodo = typeof(Queryable).GetMethods().First(m => m.Name == nome && m.GetParameters().Length == 2);
var metodoGenerico = metodo.MakeGenericMethod(new[] { typeof(TSource), tipo });
return metodoGenerico.Invoke(source, new object[] { source, lambda }) as IOrderedQueryable<TSource>;
}
}
}
Use :
example.OrderBy("Nome", "desc").ThenBy("other")
Work like:
example.OrderByDescending(r => r.Nome).ThenBy(r => r.other)
Look at this blog here. It describes a way to do this, by defining an EntitySorter<T>.
It allows you to pass in an IEntitySorter<T> into your service methods and use it like this:
public static Person[] GetAllPersons(IEntitySorter<Person> sorter)
{
using (var db = ContextFactory.CreateContext())
{
IOrderedQueryable<Person> sortedList = sorter.Sort(db.Persons);
return sortedList.ToArray();
}
}
And you can create an EntitiySorter like this:
IEntitySorter<Person> sorter = EntitySorter<Person>
.OrderBy(p => p.Name)
.ThenByDescending(p => p.Id);
Or like this:
var sorter = EntitySorter<Person>
.OrderByDescending("Address.City")
.ThenBy("Id");
You need to use the LINQ Dynamic Query Library in order to pass parameters at runtime,
This will allow linq statements like
string orderedBy = "Description";
var query = (from p in products
orderby(orderedBy)
select p);
If your columnName is in a variable col, then
string col="name";
list.OrderBy(x=>x[col])
As what Martin Liversage said, you can define a Func<>before you pass it to OrderBy method, but I found an interesting way to do that.
You can define a dictionary from string to Func<> like this :
Dictionary<string, Func<Item, object>> SortParameters = new Dictionary<string, Func<Item, object>>()
{
{"Rank", x => x.Rank}
};
And use it like this :
yourList.OrderBy(SortParameters["Rank"]);
In this case you can dynamically sort by string.
In one answer above:
The simplest & the best solution:
mylist.OrderBy(s => s.GetType().GetProperty("PropertyName").GetValue(s));
There is an syntax error, ,null must be added:
mylist.OrderBy(s => s.GetType().GetProperty("PropertyName").GetValue(s,null));