We are using the NER models to identify entities like org, percent, money, number etc - we would like to add an entity (I don't think we can extend the models) or build another model to tag these entities ( we are looking to classify financial securities).
I have just started looking at this and have used the models available so far.
I am looking at https://nlp.stanford.edu/software/crf-faq.shtml#a
to get started for the custom models are there sample data files I need to look at?
Does this still mean that the only entities that can be tagged are the already available ones like organization, date, money, location ...
Are there any changes one needs to made to the java files i.e which ones would I start with to understand how the classifier works.
Basically for some text like :
2.200% Notes due October 30, 2020 the principal amount $ 1,500,000,000.00 $ 186,750.00
I'd like to tag:
<security>2.200% Notes due October 30, 2020</security> the principal amount $ 1,500,000,000.00 $ 186,750.00
You can train a new sequence tagger with the following format:
Joe PERSON
Smith PERSON
was O
born O
in O
California LOCATION
. O
He O
works O
for O
Apple ORGANIZATION
. O
Note it should be a \t separating the token from the tag. You can use any tag you want. The statistical tagger will then be able to apply tags it saw in the training data.
You can see the full details of the properties file you should use if you look at this file in the models jar:
edu/stanford/nlp/models/ner/english.all.3class.distsim.prop
I should note, if what you're trying to extract follows a few basic patterns, you're going to probably get better results with a rule-based approach.
Here is some documentation on rule based approaches in StanfordCoreNLP:
https://nlp.stanford.edu/software/tokensregex.html
Related
I have trained Stanford NER to extract the organization names from text. I used IO tagging format. It works fine. However, I wonder if changing the tag format to IOB (or other formats) might improve the scores. ?
Suppose you have a sentence that lacks normal punctuation, like this:
John Sam Ted are all here.
If you don't have a B tag you won't be able to tell if this should be three entities or one entity with three words.
On the other hand, for many common types of entities, they can't just run together in normal English text since you'll at least have a comma between them.
If you can set it up, using IOB is better in case you have entities run together, but depending on your data set it may not be an issue. You'll have to look at the data to tell.
I am trying to extract locations from hotel reviews , by locations I mean hotel names , cities , neighbourhoods , POIs and countries . I am using a gazetter list with 165,000 entities[ this list doesn't have hotel names ] marked as location .
I have sloppygazette turned on but this gazette isn't helping much . I am confused about what should include I in the gazetter list.
PS : I am a novice as far as NLP is concerned , so little help about which features to be used is much appreciated.
Hi there is new more detailed documentation about the NER functionality here:
https://stanfordnlp.github.io/CoreNLP/ner.html
The rules format is one rule per line:
Los Angeles CITY LOCATION,MISC 1.0
Great Wall Of China LANDMARK LOCATION,MISC 1.0
Some of the functionality is only available if you use the latest code from GitHub, but a lot is available in Stanford CoreNLP 3.9.1
In short the NER annotator runs these steps:
statistical NER models
rules for numeric sequences and SUTime (for times and dates)
rules for fine grained NER (CITY, STATE_OR_PROVINCE, COUNTRY, etc...)
additional rules specified by user (this is new and not currently available in 3.9.1)
build entity mentions (identify that tokens "Los" and "Angeles" should be the entity "Los Angeles)
You can either download the code from GitHub and build the latest version, or you can just add your custom rules to the ner.fine.regexner annotator as described in the link above.
I have a custom annotated corpus, in OpenNLP format. Ex:
<START:Person> John <END> went to <START:Location> London <END>. He visited <START:Organisation> ACME Co <END> in the afternoon.
What I need is to segment sentences from this corpus. But it won't always work as expected due to the annotations.
How can I do it without losing the entity annotations?
I am using OpenNLP.
In case you want to create multiple NLP models for OpenNLP you need multiple formats to train them:
The tokenizer requires a training format
The sentence detector requires a training format
The name finder requires a training format
Therefore, you need to manage these different annotation layers in some way.
I created an annotation tool and a Maven plugin which help you doing this, have a look here. All information can be stored in a single file and the Maven plugin will generate the NLP models for you.
Let me know if you have an further questions.
I know how to train an NER model as specified here and have a very successful one in fact. I also know about the 3 provided caseless models as talked about here. But what if I want to train my own caseless model, what is the trick there? I have a bunch of all uppercase documents for training. Do I use the same training process or are there special/different features for the caseless models or are there properties that need to be set? I can't find a description as to how the provided caseless models were created.
There is only one property change in our models, which is that you want to have it invoke a function that removes case information before words are processed for classification. We do that with this property value (which also maps some words to American spelling):
wordFunction = edu.stanford.nlp.process.LowercaseAndAmericanizeFunction
but there is also simply:
wordFunction = edu.stanford.nlp.process.LowercaseFunction
Having more automatic stuff for deciding document format (hard/soft line breaks), case, or even language would be nice, but at present we don't have any of those....
I have been using the Stanford NER tagger to find the named entities in a document. The problem that I am facing is described below:-
Let the sentence be The film is directed by Ryan Fleck-Anna Boden pair.
Now the NER tagger marks Ryan as one entity, Fleck-Anna as another and Boden as a third entity. The correct marking should be Ryan Fleck as one and Anna Boden as another.
Is this a problem of the NER tagger and if it is then can it be handled?
How about
take your data and run it through Stanford NER or some other NER.
look at the results and find all the mistakes
correctly tag the incorrect results and feed them back into your NER.
lather, rinse, repeat...
This is a sort of manual boosting technique. But your NER probably won't learn too much this way.
In this case it looks like there is a new feature, hyphenated names, the the NER needs to learn about. Why not make up a bunch of hyphenated names, put them in some text, and tag them and train your NER on that?
You should get there by adding more features, more data and training.
Instead of using stanford-coreNLP you could try Apache opeNLP. There is option available to train your model based on your training data. As this model is dependent on the names supplied by you, it able to detect names of your interest.