I'm coding the rotating machinery and using the Angle type value, converted from the time like the code below.
der(thetta)=(180/pi)*from_rpm(omega) "convert time to Angle";
But, Using only this code, the angle value keep increasing.
Then, How can i make the value rotate in the 0 to 720 deg range.
(0deg => 720deg => 0deg => 720deg)
I suggest to take a look at the model Modelica.Blocks.Math.WrapAngle and the relative function Modelica.Math.wrapAngle (Modelica Standard Library 3.2.3)
They seem to behave the way you want to implement your model, though with different boundary values.
Related
I used the p5 editor to build an nft, and I'm working on getting it working in the fxhash sandbox. Using p5's random() function worked great when I uploaded my project to the sandbox, but quickly realized I needed to implement the fxrand() function to ensure that each individual iteration is the same when refreshing with the same hash.
Simply replacing all instances of the p5 random() function with fxrand() did not work, and I'm assuming because fxrand() simply generates a random number, whereas p5's random() function can be used in other ways (ie; random(-50, 50)).
How do I need to incorporate the fxrand() function into my project in a way that still works the same way as p5's random() function?
You may have already figured this out, and there's probably far better solutions (I'm very new to this), but here is what I figured out.
If I need a number from 0 to 9 then I can use this:
let randChoose1 = Math.floor(fxrand() * 10;
Anywhere I need to call that number I can simply use randChoose1 in place. For example, if I have an array named "bg" with 10 entries in the array, and I want to choose something from the array I can do this:
let randoBg = bg[randChoose1];
Maybe that's an image that I want to center on the canvas, I can call it with:
image(randoBg, width / 2, height / 2);
If I have 23 items in the array then I just need to declare randChoose1 with:
let randChoose1 = Math.floor(fxrand() * 23);
If you want to be able to have negative numbers be chosen, such as your example of a range from -50 to 50, it's just a matter of multiplying by rough total range you want and then subtracting half that.
let randChoose1 = Math.floor(fxrand() * 101 - 50;
In this case, randChoose1 will give you that range of results from -50 to 50. You have to multiply by 101 in order to make it possible for Math.floor to deliver 100 since it always rounds down.
If you found a better solution I'd love to hear it! This is something I'm struggling with as well, and my total experience with p5.js is less than a week at this point.
If you use randomSeed(int(fxrand()*987654321)) at the beginning of the setup function every time you call to the random function it will depend on fxrand
I'm trying to move an object called "car" via the dat.gui. If the user changes the x value using the dat.gui slider, the car should move along the x-axis of its local coordinate system.
here I have copied the part of the code that is causing me problems:
var m = new THREE.Vector3;
m.copy(car.position);
if (changed.key=='X') car.translateX(changed.value-car.worldToLocal(m).x);
My problem is that the expression in car.translateX always evaluates to the value that is in changed.value. The part after the minus has no effect at all or maybe is permanently 0. I have printed the values with console.log and the values of car.position.x and m change in each step, but the subtraction still delivers in every step only the result that is already in changed.value anyway. Can someone help me and tell me why this happens?
Unfortunately, I am absolutely stuck.
car.worldToLocal(m)
I'm afraid this piece of code makes no sense since car.position (and thus m) already represents the car's position in local space.
Instead of using translateX() you achieve the same result by modifying car.position directly:
car.position.x = changed.value;
trying to create a player damage indication when a collision with an enemy occurs.
I used this code within a collision event of the player object:
direction = point_direction(other.x,other.y,x,y);
hsp = lengthdir_x(6,direction);
vsp = lengthdir_y(4,direction)-2;
if (sign(hsp) !=0) image_xscale = sign(hsp);
However, the player object is simply pushed upward vertically rather than backwards in a parabola.
Any, ideas on how to implement a basic knockback system?
If you want a parabola, you can add an upward force afterward, like so:
direction = point_direction(other.x, other.y, x , y);
speed = 6
motion_add(90, 3)
If you don't and you'd rather a more "repeatable" parabola that always look the same, maybe you should use another method, something like
if other.x>x {hdirection=1}else{hdirection=-1}
hspeed = hdirection*6
vspeed = -2
I believe this would work better for what you're trying to achieve, unless you want to implement knockback variable depending on the angle of collision.
So I would need to see all the rest of your player physics to be sure, but I can tell you right now that direction = point_direction(other.x,other.y,x,y); is probable not what you mean, and same goes for lengthdir(). The exact origins of the colliding objects at the moment of collision have a huge effect on what that direction is, which can cause a lot of screwiness. For example: if the line is perfectly horizontal (because other.y == y) then lengthdir_y() will always be equal to zero for any input value no matter how huge.
But more importantly direction is a built-in variable of GameMaker, so using it with a custom physics system can also cause some screwiness. Fox's answer might help if you are using built-ins, but based on the fact that you have an "hsp" and "vsp" instead of hspeed and vspeed, my guess is you want to avoid built-ins.
If you just want to get the horizontal direction of the collision, you should use sign(x - other.x). Then, instead of using lengthdir(), you can just use a constant. Here it is all together:
var dir = sign(x - other.x)
hsp = 6*dir; //I'm assuming that 6 is how much horizontal you wanted
vsp = -4;
if (sign(hsp) !=0) image_xscale = sign(hsp); //This line could just go in your step event
Hope that helps! Feel free to comment if you have more questions.
still learning about Ruby + Sketchup!
Today,I would like to add a measurement (good english word ?) as I can do manually with the 'cotation' (french version) tool when I click to point then drag the measure text.
Can't find that in the docs to do with Ruby and API ...
Thanks for your help
You are probably looking for the Sketchup::Entities::add_dimension_linear method.
http://ruby.sketchup.com/Sketchup/Entities.html#add_dimension_linear-instance_method
Assuming a and b below are edges
voffset = [-20, 0, 0]
Sketchup.active_model.entities.add_dimension_linear(a.start, b.start, voffset)
The value of voffset controls not just how far offset the dimension is, but also the axis along which the measurement is made. You may need to experiment with different values to get a feeling for how that determination is done. As with many things in SketchUp, it often guesses (or 'infers') at what you want.
I am using Paraview 5.0.1. If any solution requires updating, I can try.
I want to programmatically obtain field plots (and corresponding PlotOverLine) of displacements and stresses in rotated coordinate systems.
What are appropriate/convenient/possible ways of doing this?
So far, I have created one Calculator filter for each component of displacements and stresses.
For instance, I used Calculators in 2D with results
(displacement.iHat)*cos(0.7853981625)+(displacement.jHat)*sin(0.7853981625)
(stress_3-stress_0)*sin(45.0*3.14159265/180)*cos(45.0*3.14159265/180)+stress_1*((cos(45.0*3.14159265/180))^2-(sin(45.0*3.14159265/180))^2)
It works fine, but it is quite cumbersome, in several aspects:
Creating them (one filter per component).
Plotting several of them in a single XY plot
Exporting them (one export per component).
Is there a simple way to do this?
PS: The Transform filter does not accomplish this. It rotates the view, not the fields.
Two solutions:
Ugly, inneficient solution
Use Transform and check "Transform All Input vectors"
Add a calculator and add a dummy array
Use transform the other way around, without checking "Transform All Input vectors"
Correct solution :
Compute the transformation yourself in a programmable filter
input = self.GetUnstructuredGridInput();
output = self.GetUnstructuredGridOutput();
output.ShallowCopy(input)
data = input.GetPointData().GetArray("YourArray")
vec = vtk.vtkDoubleArray();
vec.SetNumberOfComponents(3);
vec.SetName("TransformedVectors");
numPoints = input.GetNumberOfPoints()
for i in xrange(0, numPoints):
tuple = data.GetTuple(i)
transform(tuple) # implement the transform in python
vec.InsertNextTuple(tuple)
output.GetPointData().AddArray(vec)