Go line-length-linter: How to ignore one line? - go

I get this warning:
main.go:72: line is 191 characters (lll)
klog.Fatalf("no ...") //nolint:lll
I added nolint:lll, but this does not silence this warning.
We use https://golangci-lint.run/
I want to ignore this line only (no global configuration).

I am not sure but I think klog.Fatalf() is nothing but a block of code.
Could you please try the below suggestions:
//nolint:all
klog.Fatalf("no ...")
OR
klog.Fatalf("no ...") //nolint:all
OR
klog.Fatalf("no ...") //nolint:golint,unused
For the reference you can refer this link

Related

how to get current running code line and directory name in go [duplicate]

In C/C++ you can use __FILE__ and __LINE__ to get access to the current file and line number.
Does Go provide something similar?
Indeed it does:
http://golang.org/pkg/runtime/#Caller
runtime.Caller can also be used to get the file name/line number of calling functions, too.

fix Line is too long error in a ruby file

how to fix Line is too long error in a ruby file without ignoring it and not introducing new errors.
I have tried giving the extra character in the next line using IDE. It is introducing new errors like 'Ternary operators must not be nested. Prefer if or else constructs instead.'
Rubocop already suggested the way to fix this error. Let me repeat it here. Assuming you have a very long line that reads:
variable = long_condition ? true_clause : false_clause
change it to:
variable = if long_condition
true_clause
else
false_clause
end
Other way would be to instruct rubocop to [temporary] ignore this error by running from the very project directory:
rubocop --auto-gen-config
Or, as last but not the least chance, update your .rubocop.yml file to increase a line length within a respective rule.
Rubocop tells you what to do, just follow its advice.
Also, have a look at the ruby styleguide, which explains all the rubocop rules in detail.

go test flag: flag provided but not defined

Hi I am using a flag when testing in go:
file_test.go
var ip = flag.String("ip", "noip", "test")
I am only using this in one test file. And it works fine when only testing that one test file, but when I run:
go test ./... -ip 127.0.0.1 alle of the other test file saying: flag provided but not defined.
Have you seen this?
Regards
flag.Parse() is being called before your flag is defined.
You have to make sure that all flag definitions happen before calling flag.Parse(), usually by defining all flags inside init() functions.
If you've migrated to golang 13, it changed the order of the test initializer,
so it could lead to something like
flag provided but not defined: -test.timeout
as a possible workaround, you can use
var _ = func() bool {
testing.Init()
return true
}()
that would call test initialization before the application one. More info can be found on the original thread:
https://github.com/golang/go/issues/31859#issuecomment-489889428
do not call flag.Parse() in any init()
I'm very late to the party; but is this broken (again) on Go 1.19.5?
I hit the same errors reported on this thread and the same solution reported above (https://github.com/golang/go/issues/31859#issuecomment-489889428) fixes it.
I see a call to flags.Parse() was added back in go_test.go in v1.18
https://go.googlesource.com/go/+/f7248f05946c1804b5519d0b3eb0db054dc9c5d6%5E%21/src/cmd/go/go_test.go
I am only just learning Go so it'd be nice to have some verification from people more skilled before I report this elsewhere.
If you get this, when running command via docker-compose then you do incorrect quoting. Eg.
services:
app:
...
image: kumina/openvpn-exporter:latest
command: [
"--openvpn.status_paths", "/etc/openvpn_exporter/openvpn-status.log",
"--openvpn.status_paths /etc/openvpn_exporter/openvpn-status.log",
]
First is correct, second is wrong, because whole line counted as one parameter. You need to split them by passing two separate strings, like in first line.

Why does missing "require" / "include" call error_handler an extra time?

I have a custom error handler set up using set_error_handler. When I tried to include a file that doesn't exist, PHP calls error_handler one more time than it should:
<?php
error_reporting(E_ALL | E_STRICT);
set_error_handler(function($errno, $errstr, $errfile, $errline, $errcontext){
if(error_reporting() !== 0){
echo "<br>";
echo "<br>In Custom Error Handler...";
echo "<br>Err String: ", $errstr;
echo "<br>Passing to Default Handler...";
}
return false; // allow default
});
include("/missing_file.php"); // line 11
?>
Output:
In Custom Error Handler... // this is the extra error handler call
Err String: include(/missing_file.php)
[function.include]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory
Passing to Default Handler...
// the default handler does nothing, even though error_reporting is not zero
// Next Phase:
In Custom Error Handler...
Err String: include() [function.include]: Failed
opening '/missing_file.php' for inclusion
(include_path='.:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php')
Passing to Default
Handler...
Warning: include() [function.include]: Failed opening
'/missing_file.php' for inclusion
in
/home/yccom/public_html/apr/test.php on line 11
The same behavior is observed with require.
For example, changing line 11 to require will give this output:
In Custom Error Handler... // this is the extra error handler call
Err String: require(/missing_file.php) [function.require]: failed to
open stream: No such file or directory
Passing to Default Handler...
// the default handler does nothing, even though error_reporting is
not zero
// Next Phase:
Fatal error: require() [function.require]: Failed opening required '/missing_file.php' in /home/yccom/public_html/apr/test.php on
line 11
What may be causing the error handler's additional call?
It's quite simple, really. PHP's lifecycle consists of 4 distinct phases:
Parsing
Compilation
Scanning
Execution
for your code to be parsed, all files that are included/required need to be fetched in the first phase, to translate the code into meaningful expressions. Your file doesn't exist, so a warning is issued.
Next, the compilation phase encounters the same include statement, and tries to convert the expressions into opcodes. The file doesn't exist, so a warning is issued.
Scanning translates code into tokens, which again cannot be done for the missing include file.
Execution time... The file cannot be executed because it is missing.
Why would PHP work like this? Isn't it stupid to blunder along, eventhough a file is missing?
In a way, yes, but include is used to include files that are non-critical to the script, if you really need that file's contents, you use require (but preferably require_once). The latter emits, as you stated, a fatal error, and stops everything dead in its tracks. That's what should happen if you're depending on another file for your code to function.
The require construct issues an E_COMPILER_ERROR, which effectively halts the compiler (not unlike __halt_compiler) at a given offset(the line where the failing require statement resides).
Check these slides for more details on each of the 4 main phases.
The reason why your code emits four warnings, is simply because PHP tries to include the file four times. Try running the script from the command line, but use strace:
$ strace -o output.txt php yourScript.php
open the output file, and see the internals of the Zend engine. Pay special attention to lines that look like:
lstat("/your/path/./file.php", 0x50113add8355) = -1//0x5... ~= 0xsomeaddress
You'll see where PHP goes looking for the file: it's all its include_path directories, the cwd, /usr/share/php, probably a pear or lib directory, and the include path you explicitly set.
I've gotten the idea to do this from this site, and based on the output I got, this seems to me to be the most plausible explanation as to why you see multiple errors.

Does clang allow preprocessor ==?

I am trying to compile PHP on my Mac OS X 10.8 and I am getting the following problem:
In file included from /Users/ryan/Downloads/php-5.4.5/ext/phar/util.c:23:
ext/phar/phar_internal.h:223:19: error: invalid token at start of a preprocessor
expression
# if SIZEOF_SHORT == 2
^
I'm not sure why this error is occurring as this looks fine to me. I have opened the header file and could make changes if not or remove the if all together as I know what my system should be, but I was wondering if this is the proper approach to this problem.
It looks like SIZEOF_SHORT expands to no tokens. You should investigate where SIZEOF_SHORT is being #defined (this may be on the command line via -DSIZEOF_SHORT=) and fix that to provide the right value.
Alternatively, you could use this:
#include "limits.h"
/* ... */
#if SHRT_BIT == CHAR_BIT * 2
I didn't really find a solution to this problem, but I removed the if's and left behind the line that would be processed anyway and the program compiled just fine. I really don't know what was wrong with this file.

Resources